You can

But I said

To eat the best you can to stay healthy.

It's 30.00

You can eat perfectly healthy for much less than 10 a meal

Most people spend a lot more than is necessary on "luxury" spending

It's just the cost of things would go up.

Maybe not forever.

Some austerity over a short period of time is doable

Just until the trade deals are made and everything is on paper and through the proper channels.

China can't recover the loss of american business though

That's what I was trying to say. Jeez, took me long enough.

Ok, then I misunderstood

My position in the China debate is that we are in a much stronger position because of the trade deficit

And Trump's use of tariffs is a good way of leveraging that advantage

Placing tariffs because they want a better military?

No

Currently because of their unfair trading practices

But technically we should leverage for any important thing we want

@campodin "eating healthy for 10(dollar?) a day"

This, tho sadly the meat will be pig

other type of meat would rise the price above 10 here

Daily Question 🔖 @everyone

Should the economy be made to serve the people, or the people made to serve the economy?

People

Gay

no u

Bit of both

Measure it out

I don't understand the question

Ok centrist

It should be made to work in tandem with.

The economy isn't a thing by itself, the economy is a bunch of people.

Let the economy serve itself.

The economy should be made to serve the people.

The question doesn't make sense.

@Zayan Watchel is correct

The economy is a collection of scarce resources that people use. People are also inside of the economy, it's a group.

I didn't care for the wording of the question. People can't be made to serve the economy if they are the economy. Ergo, my response.

I interpreted the question as what should the purpose of a economy be in relation to people.

The government is a group of people, is it not? @Zayan Watchel

only in a democracy