Message from @The Big Oof
Discord ID: 493531006804951052
@Deleted User Summed up: Fascism is good*
Well. Hit me with a program, let's go down the list.
Social programs such as tax benefits for a stable nuclear family with kids
To encourage native population growth
Tax benefits should not exist to anyone. 15% tax rate for each person.
We should do what Hitler initially did and pay for the occasional recreational activity with your family @Doctor Anon
I'm not a Nazi, but that was a good idea
People can pay for that with their own money.
It wasn't often
Just an occasional thing
like, going to the movies with your family, paid for by your employer
Government funded fun? That should happen never.
A flat tax is not good in practice
You can use your own money.
I don't view it as fun
it encourages people to have families
Going to the movies?
I'll be back in 10 minutes.
Tax Benefits for a stable nuclear family with kids is ideal
When people have to say "Im not a nazi" before agreeing with any idea ever implemented in Nazi Germany, even if it was used in other places. <:hangthink:487681962505404416> <:hangthink:487681962505404416> <:hangthink:487681962505404416>
Well, tbqh
Back.
As I was saying, going to the movies on taxpayer money is stupid.
it wasn't on taxpayer money
If you make money on the market you can pay yourself.
Wasn't it gov funded?
I could be wrong about how it worked, but from what I remember
Most employees were working like, over 50 hours a week, and, in exchange, the company they worked for would pay for leisure activities so they could spent time with their family
Why do the companies need to? Doesn't the employer pay a paycheck?
It was to encourage them to spend time with their family
Maybe the thought was
They don't do it normally? If they don't, that's a social issue. The social order shouldn't be decided by the state.
"Wow, I can get paid to spend time with my family, I wish had children"
That is a perverse incentive.
People want to have children because of biology, why does the government need to help that?
I don't know what exactly the motivation was, I just know that it was a thing for the time, I think this was in the middle of the depression
People have children *right now* just fine, tax incentives or no.
Why does it need to exist? Are you supporting it? What I'm really getting at is *why* is this your view on the role of government.
Well, people have less kids now than ever before, but that's because we thought it was a good idea to let women have careers
It doesn't really *have* to exist, as for the actual implementation, to be quite honest, I don't really know. But it is something I would get behind if I was sure it would be feasible, if that answers your question, so yes.
And, as for why, because the state should foster a society that is family centered.
So if we're forcing people to pay for other people to go to the movies... no problem, none at all? If it doesn't have to exist, it shouldn't.
But *why* should the state do this.