All of this requires a powerful government.

As for why, because of what use is your country if the people succumb to nihilistic consumerism?

What reason would they have to take pride in it, and, if they lack pride in it, why would they protect it? See modern day Europe and the United States.

Flooded with third worlders, a preference for foreigners, no fucking respect, absolute hatred of their own country @Zayan Watchel

^Summed up: Nationalism is good

<:this:487682424562647060>

Nationalism is great, I agree, but I think if we strip this country of all social programs and removed the corrupt incentives for third worlders to come here, we could open the borders.

All social programs?

"strip the country of all social programs"

Nonono

Until then, it's necessary for the borders to remain close, which I think is an unjust usage of government.

@Deleted User Summed up: Fascism is good*

Well. Hit me with a program, let's go down the list.

Social programs such as tax benefits for a stable nuclear family with kids

To encourage native population growth

Tax benefits should not exist to anyone. 15% tax rate for each person.

We should do what Hitler initially did and pay for the occasional recreational activity with your family @Doctor Anon

I'm not a Nazi, but that was a good idea

People can pay for that with their own money.

It wasn't often

Just an occasional thing

like, going to the movies with your family, paid for by your employer

Government funded fun? That should happen never.

A flat tax is not good in practice

You can use your own money.

I don't view it as fun

it encourages people to have families

Going to the movies?

I'll be back in 10 minutes.

Tax Benefits for a stable nuclear family with kids is ideal

When people have to say "Im not a nazi" before agreeing with any idea ever implemented in Nazi Germany, even if it was used in other places. <:hangthink:487681962505404416> <:hangthink:487681962505404416> <:hangthink:487681962505404416>

Well, tbqh

National Socialism is gay

Back.

As I was saying, going to the movies on taxpayer money is stupid.

it wasn't on taxpayer money

If you make money on the market you can pay yourself.

Wasn't it gov funded?

I could be wrong about how it worked, but from what I remember

Most employees were working like, over 50 hours a week, and, in exchange, the company they worked for would pay for leisure activities so they could spent time with their family

Why do the companies need to? Doesn't the employer pay a paycheck?

It was to encourage them to spend time with their family

Maybe the thought was

They don't do it normally? If they don't, that's a social issue. The social order shouldn't be decided by the state.

"Wow, I can get paid to spend time with my family, I wish had children"