Explain

I think it's unwise to generalize birth groups. Birth groups show extreme variation

There is variation, always

You're clustering "a group of migrants" and "a native population" together

Extreme variation.

To a degree where it's not really worth making de jure policies on

You're also neglecting the plethora of other factors

Isn't the purpose of a generalization meant to demonstrate what they are like "in general?"

I've never understood the "NOT ALL!" response

In general, most mass shooters are white Americans, for instance.

Would it be reasonable to create policies off of this information?

No.

Do you know why?

Because said group being studied represents the minority of a minority

"To a degree where it's not really worth making de jure policies on"

I mean, if 52% of Hispanic households are on some form of government assistance, I think we can decide to at the very least limit low skilled migration from Hispanic countries"

What would the purpose of limiting migration be?

It'd only cause others to suffer within their native country.

lol do you think they would care about you suffering?

Yes?

I live in a rather multi-ethnic place in America.

Where do you think I live?

I'll avoid the specific city, but I can most certainly say that yes, minority groups and migrants do indeed care about the native population

No clue, really

The continental US, most likely

Where do you live?

Also, urban, suburban, or rural?

Rural, but it's not "all-white", tons of blacks and Hispanics

ni

ke

is

a

great

company

Alright...

This "all racists live in all white areas" is just stupid

Every liberal I know lives in an all white neighborhood, generally speaking

Rural regions tend to be where more conservative attitudes are held due to a lack of interaction/experience with other cultures, as is more common in other areas

Would you consider me a "liberal"?

Have I met you?

I call myself more of a leftist, but if you consider these attitudes liberal...

I mean, it's 40% black.....