Message from @SilverLining
Discord ID: 505813237770485761
And it'd make sense for someone to be more radical rn
When there's an election right around the corner
Because it's an inherently more political time
Well, Trump talks about a lot of people. There is no commonality between all these people specifically.
And there are plenty of things that offer suspicion.
Also, nobody is really saying
"All the right is like this" - It's more just "hey, bad people exist on the right, perhaps somewhat violent rhetoric shouldn't be encouraged by Trump" (for example, like trump offering to pay legal fees for anyone who commits assault)
Trump specifically demonizes the people listed
Among others, ofc
but them included
The commonality is that they're all prominent liberals, really
That does not separate them from other targets the bomber could have chosen. Why did he chose only these? Well, if you look at it, all are close to Hillary Clinton. So, it makes the theory of false flag more likely.
Or, get this
He views Hillary as some terrible enemy of the state
The center of corruption and the resist movement
or something like that
And thus, he's attacking her and everyone close to her
to "drain the swamp" or something
I also do like how this only applies to violent rightists
Perhaps you don't follow that line of reasoning
But I've heard multiple other people mention it
Cory Booker too? And Robert De Niro is part of swamp? The point is that there is no way you can create a set wherein only these people would be members of that set.
Also, there are positive evidence pieces to believe why it may be a false flag.
such as?
And if you believe hollywood is evil and filled with pedophiles
it was a right winger so it can;t be real
or hella liberal with anti-conservative, anti-american propaganda, or whatever
Then sure, you'd probably be more willing to attack 'em
Hillary and Obama are the only obvious targets, DeNiro is absolutely insane of a target and so is CNN. Delivering the packages by hand is beyond amateur its asking to be caught, not to mention the difficulty of orchestrating everything in a short time frame.
Hillary has more than one skeelton in her closet, the false flags are usualyl overseas and used to justify interference, usually they are absurdely pushed by the left. The right is also happy, or rathe rthe republicans, are more than happy to jumpo on that wagon as well. The serin gas in syria is the most recent false flag
tbf
Trump consistently calls CNN lying media, fake news, etc, trying to cast it as an enemy set out to destroy him
It's incredible reasonable it'd be a casualty if one were to become radically pro trump
usually amateur bombs blow up the person tbh, many terrorist attacks have been foiled by the simple implementation of speed bumps. Im not kidding the bombs are so volatile or rather without any safety that thye just go off.
Unless it's amateur to a degree where the packaging is suspect
and the propaganda value of this guy is just too much, insane people tend to make their plans wor to some degree someone dies
and nobody actually, y'know, opens it
or gets horribly hurt.
and just calls a bomb squad...
Plus, they've presumably got...
still why send things to obama and hillary, its obvious those would be screened
Layers and layers of security between them
there was no chance of this plan actually working