Even even in the current example, why do you not believe the evidence provided?

The bombs could've gone off, but they were detected before it reached that stage...

Why now? None of these people are relevant anymore. There is no reason to target them and not Senators running in races. And there are plenty of reasons to believe it is a false flag. Is it? We don't know for sure. But it very likely is.

'cept they are in quite a few circles

Trump still talks about 'em in his speeches

And the looming soros is just omnipresent in a lot of rightist circles when discussing liberals or the left

~~Even though Soros aided in efforts to create more private industries within China and the USSR, but I digress~~

And it'd make sense for someone to be more radical rn

When there's an election right around the corner

Because it's an inherently more political time

Well, Trump talks about a lot of people. There is no commonality between all these people specifically.
And there are plenty of things that offer suspicion.

Also, nobody is really saying

"All the right is like this" - It's more just "hey, bad people exist on the right, perhaps somewhat violent rhetoric shouldn't be encouraged by Trump" (for example, like trump offering to pay legal fees for anyone who commits assault)

Trump specifically demonizes the people listed

Among others, ofc

but them included

The commonality is that they're all prominent liberals, really

That does not separate them from other targets the bomber could have chosen. Why did he chose only these? Well, if you look at it, all are close to Hillary Clinton. So, it makes the theory of false flag more likely.

Or, get this

He views Hillary as some terrible enemy of the state

The center of corruption and the resist movement

or something like that

And thus, he's attacking her and everyone close to her

to "drain the swamp" or something

I also do like how this only applies to violent rightists

Perhaps you don't follow that line of reasoning

But I've heard multiple other people mention it

"This is a false flag, and besides, the democrats already stage attacks of their own"

Cory Booker too? And Robert De Niro is part of swamp? The point is that there is no way you can create a set wherein only these people would be members of that set.
Also, there are positive evidence pieces to believe why it may be a false flag.

such as?

And if you believe hollywood is evil and filled with pedophiles

it was a right winger so it can;t be real

or hella liberal with anti-conservative, anti-american propaganda, or whatever

Then sure, you'd probably be more willing to attack 'em

Hillary and Obama are the only obvious targets, DeNiro is absolutely insane of a target and so is CNN. Delivering the packages by hand is beyond amateur its asking to be caught, not to mention the difficulty of orchestrating everything in a short time frame.

Hillary has more than one skeelton in her closet, the false flags are usualyl overseas and used to justify interference, usually they are absurdely pushed by the left. The right is also happy, or rathe rthe republicans, are more than happy to jumpo on that wagon as well. The serin gas in syria is the most recent false flag

tbf

Trump consistently calls CNN lying media, fake news, etc, trying to cast it as an enemy set out to destroy him

It's incredible reasonable it'd be a casualty if one were to become radically pro trump

usually amateur bombs blow up the person tbh, many terrorist attacks have been foiled by the simple implementation of speed bumps. Im not kidding the bombs are so volatile or rather without any safety that thye just go off.

Unless it's amateur to a degree where the packaging is suspect

and the propaganda value of this guy is just too much, insane people tend to make their plans wor to some degree someone dies