there is a lot going on on twitter etc. to show this guy and the conspiracy theories or rather theories of soros etc. as those of nutcases

this one instance has so much propaganda value that its almost tangible an ocean and continent awya

generally speaking its 90% a false flag

if they were legit the bombs would have gone off at some point

of whom CNN would have suffered the most

The use of pipe bombs, which is the worst way to kill a target shows that it was more of a scare (and/or a false flag).

or some dude who's an amateur and most likely insane, y'know?

Prolly not gonna be too sophisticated/effective if you're mentally ill and filled with hate

Anywho, DeNiro is a vocal critic of Trump - It'd make sense to go after 'em you're something akin to a cult member who vehemently follows Trump and believes in some vast conspiracy against 'em

But beyond that, what "false flags" have the democrats made?

What proof do you have of them?

Even even in the current example, why do you not believe the evidence provided?

The bombs could've gone off, but they were detected before it reached that stage...

Why now? None of these people are relevant anymore. There is no reason to target them and not Senators running in races. And there are plenty of reasons to believe it is a false flag. Is it? We don't know for sure. But it very likely is.

'cept they are in quite a few circles

Trump still talks about 'em in his speeches

And the looming soros is just omnipresent in a lot of rightist circles when discussing liberals or the left

~~Even though Soros aided in efforts to create more private industries within China and the USSR, but I digress~~

And it'd make sense for someone to be more radical rn

When there's an election right around the corner

Because it's an inherently more political time

Well, Trump talks about a lot of people. There is no commonality between all these people specifically.
And there are plenty of things that offer suspicion.

Also, nobody is really saying

"All the right is like this" - It's more just "hey, bad people exist on the right, perhaps somewhat violent rhetoric shouldn't be encouraged by Trump" (for example, like trump offering to pay legal fees for anyone who commits assault)

Trump specifically demonizes the people listed

Among others, ofc

but them included

The commonality is that they're all prominent liberals, really

That does not separate them from other targets the bomber could have chosen. Why did he chose only these? Well, if you look at it, all are close to Hillary Clinton. So, it makes the theory of false flag more likely.

Or, get this

He views Hillary as some terrible enemy of the state

The center of corruption and the resist movement

or something like that

And thus, he's attacking her and everyone close to her

to "drain the swamp" or something

I also do like how this only applies to violent rightists

Perhaps you don't follow that line of reasoning

But I've heard multiple other people mention it

"This is a false flag, and besides, the democrats already stage attacks of their own"

Cory Booker too? And Robert De Niro is part of swamp? The point is that there is no way you can create a set wherein only these people would be members of that set.
Also, there are positive evidence pieces to believe why it may be a false flag.

such as?