I'd think that it'd help just we need to make sure our cities modernize in order to avoid our future looking like fucking China and India had sex and made a massive slum city.

Which is difficult for them.

Honestly it's less about density and more about alienation. Cities within the urban center are more ecologically sound, it's the suburban sprawl and communting that cause these issues

Let’s milk black people

Cities however are quite alienating and set up poorly

well it's only natural for people to want to live together

What needs to be done is a creation of living spaces which keep us in close proximity and create closer communities, but also add in the naturalistic parts of urban life

I could have said what I said better it's never good to have a very high density of people in one spot

Based on what exactly?

I'm pretty anti-city but that's not why

Mixed urban rural areas, what i mean by that is well panne dout cities where the urban sprawl is rather reduced and not so much populated along with a more developed nad expansive rural area, and well planned rural "cities"

https://youtu.be/0Z760XNy4VM

rural enviorments are just healthier the issue mostly stems from absolute piss poor planning

Garden cities seems the way to go

^

For those cities that already exist yes

otherwise id focus on rural, considering the brith rate is going down anyways

rural enviorments will also reduce absolute political and social depravity

This experiment was done on mice on that link I posted but it was supposed to be used as a basis for people as well

Rural living comes with many issues as well

mouse utopia experiment?

true but i prefer rural vastly to city

Yeah

The solution to the problems of cities is not the introduction of the problems of rural living

The West will only survive in the countryside

most rural issues are minimal, if planning is done correctly there really are no issues at all.

urbanization has caused the problems we see today

I live in Oklahoma I don't have to worry about any of this LOL

In Canada the power balance is non-existent.

Surround the city by the countryside ;D

Hurt

Cities hold 20-37 seats in Parliament, and entire territories often hold one.

But the urban seats can still control what happens to the rural territories.

depends on how many people live in each section

if cities have more people than territories then yeah that's justified

You can't have the city dwelling people decide what happens to rural areas like the northern territories.

I believe that is due to the territories having an insufficient population to do so

They can't begin to understand what life is like without being there, they banned the seal hunt and demanded that the people in the tundra start building greenhouses for food. :U

I personally agree with you, the people living in the rural regions should decide for themselves but like

how many people really leave out there?

Tens of thousands.