No

Yes in a weird sense

No

no

No

oof

fuck no

No

universality is a spook

absolutely not

no

OOF

It's possible. You can implement it....your country just won't last very long.

OOOOOOfof

no

nope

because not all jobs have the same responsibilities

This sort of mindset results in a number of lost businesses and less open job positions because each business would have to meet a threshold for each employee they take on.

oil rig workers shouldn't be paid the same as burgerflippers

if a system was implemented in a highly advanced tech state

No... there is always work to be done. People can be put to work doing almost anything on behalf of the nation

where every person manages to benefit the nation with every action

then yes

a very small UBI

would be beneficial

however

If social security is inevitable then yes as it's cheaper in costs due to less administrative work. Though the downside is that drug addicts and the like will have access to it

Eg if a living wage is £22k a year

It would be a good idea, if not for the fact that the left will ruin it, make it way too high, and destroy the incentive to find work and actually put value to the currency of UBI

then the UBI should be £5K a year

meaning peeps still need to work

but its a way to make them value hte government

eg in their minds its free money

UBI would only be realistic in a hyper-automated society where robots do most of the work

But the economy would have to be surplus based

A right winger reforming social security to give everyone enough to live on would be a fine idea, better than the welfare state as it currently exists now, but it just won't be handled well

and not debt based as it is today

eg

in a debt based economy

all money must be sppent

but in a surplus based