Message from @Da_Fish

Discord ID: 473218156840747008


2018-07-29 19:58:13 UTC  

wtffff

2018-07-29 19:58:18 UTC  

these are all nation states

2018-07-29 19:58:19 UTC  

Stop, let me address how you're wrong one at a time.

2018-07-29 19:58:31 UTC  

they have an authority and border

2018-07-29 19:58:38 UTC  

Egypt's identity was religious and shifted through time, the nation was embodied by the dynasty.

2018-07-29 19:58:44 UTC  

no

2018-07-29 19:58:47 UTC  

Persia really has no national identity.

2018-07-29 19:58:52 UTC  

Yes. You are simply blatantly wrong.

2018-07-29 19:58:57 UTC  

those are or where nations

2018-07-29 19:59:01 UTC  

Persia was routinely conquered by foreign entities.

2018-07-29 19:59:09 UTC  

routinely

2018-07-29 19:59:10 UTC  

no

2018-07-29 19:59:10 UTC  

There was no national identity to speak of.

2018-07-29 19:59:15 UTC  

Yes, routinely.

2018-07-29 19:59:29 UTC  

Muh nations came around in 1850

2018-07-29 19:59:36 UTC  

no thats not a thing

2018-07-29 19:59:39 UTC  

Jalayirids, Mongols, Gokturks, Oghuzi Turks, Scythians.

2018-07-29 19:59:43 UTC  

Persia has repeatedly been conquered.

2018-07-29 19:59:45 UTC  

look at european empires

2018-07-29 19:59:56 UTC  

they had nationalism for as long as they where around

2018-07-29 20:00:00 UTC  

look at mercantilism

2018-07-29 20:02:56 UTC  

Mercantilism was based on the acquirement of resources.

2018-07-29 20:03:00 UTC  

Has nothing to do with nationalism.

2018-07-29 20:03:22 UTC  

How about we start by you defining what a nation state is because it clearly is not what an actual nation state is if you think Persia and Egypt and China were nation states.

2018-07-29 20:05:58 UTC  

France was not even a nation before the French Revolution. It was numerous languages and *communal* cultures. People did not speak "French" outside of the Ile-de-France.

2018-07-29 20:06:01 UTC  

Same thing in China.

2018-07-29 20:06:28 UTC  

Mandarin, the word itself, refers to the court language of the Qing dynasty. People did not speak Mandarin. There were various local languages. Same as France.

2018-07-29 20:06:34 UTC  

There was no national identity to speak of.

2018-07-29 20:06:39 UTC  

You are simply historically incorrect on this.

2018-07-29 20:07:24 UTC  

The word Mandarin literally comes from the Portuguese word for minister.

2018-07-29 20:08:48 UTC  

Egypt did not really have a collective identity until the Muslim conquests, and thereafter it had a religious identity just like European states did until the erosion of that form of identity by the Westphalian system and the secularization of Europe by liberalism in the 18th and 19th centuries, giving birth to actual ethnolinguistic identities.

2018-07-29 20:08:59 UTC  

Which was fostered by increased communication and standardization of language.

2018-07-29 20:09:36 UTC  

To further my point Egypt was not even ruled by Egyptians during the Mamluk period. The Mamluks were first Turks under the Bahris and then Circassians under the Burjis, who controlled the Ayyubid caliph as a figurehead to maintain order.

2018-07-29 20:09:42 UTC  

Notice something there? The caliph is a religious figure.

2018-07-29 20:10:19 UTC  

Religious identity more than anything was the defining characteristic of national character and therefore the precursor of the nation state, which in most cases only arose in the 19th century.

2018-07-29 20:10:23 UTC  

Think about this

2018-07-29 20:10:40 UTC  

How did mercantilism call for wealth do be kept?

2018-07-29 20:10:41 UTC  

The cosmopolitan nature of countries like Egypt and China and France disallowed an ethnolinguistic identity to form.

2018-07-29 20:10:43 UTC  

By classes

2018-07-29 20:10:49 UTC  

by people

2018-07-29 20:10:57 UTC  

or by a __nation__