No, and we didnt HAVE Iran up until the 1970s or whenver Chuch was forced out of schools

MUH GERMANIC PAGANISM

it wasnt Iran

That s an atheist wives tale

or jew.

Many modern people interpret separation of church and state to mean separation of religion and public life but i believe that's an oddity of our Anglo Saxon society

Which privatizes religion

When you have a community that is 100% chrisitan, how can the STATE tell them they cant have a school that REFLECTS that reality

Thats not in teh constitution.

Here's the thing

That was jewish judges who did that

look into it

KRITARCHY

American Protestantism couldn't be a state entity

thats not the way it's structured

Quakers, Baptists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Shakers

All these groups couldnt lead a state

because they are decentralized and private

the way religion should be

@Deleted User

Well it really depends on what you define religion to be. It isnt easy to separate religion from culture, especially in less modern societies

Religion plays a huge part in culture and vice versa

Personally I am a primitive baptist

Yeah I assume that's why the US is going downhill

Was it "Iran" in your Catholic school

What a shitty retort

Wait what

backtrack

Religion for europeans doesn't need definition

I am just saying you dont want an Iranian style theocracy

It's Christianity

No that's not what I proposed

More specifically, Protestantism

Monarchies had cooperation with a churchy

It wasnt theocri

Theocratic

You don't want people taking orders from someone else who runs a state

I know. But what im saying is decentralized religions could definitely lead a state if they were to first control the culture. People generally conflate religion to mean Western style religion aka Christianity.

England has an official church now!

It has had one for the past 1,700 years

haha

@Deleted User