Message from @Summī Imperator, 呪い殿
Discord ID: 489522348463226881
Because there was regret associated with bearing a bastard child.
Fetuses arent an exception to the rule, rather they are the starting base to question and shift and make the idea of lide and the concept itself potentially fluid. Or rather the concept of who deserves life
If rights are fluid then they can be fluid in other ways
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 btw I don't know anything about high heels on cobblestone stairs. So I see no reason why we should assume any person would
For example perhaps society may decide to revoke the citizenship of new immigrants who gained it over the last 10 years because these administrations were deemed ilegitimate
But that's a violation of their rights...but rights are a dubious fluid conceot
So you know what high heels are?
And you know what cobble is.
I mean in my opinion tha tis valid
immigrants inherit the granted rights of their forefathers
Put the two together and you have?
I mena a lot depends on intent
A reckless behavior that is dangerous.
However, I am not worried about this hypothetical because we know the justice system always favors women and is extra lenient on them
Always eh
Then it would be fine.
there are behaviours that are reasonable to be ignorant of how reckless they are and others that are not
You couldn't prove she knew this would kill the child.
So she gets away with it.
I see
I love how (the last 50 years) is now equal to all of human history
Lie detectors exist
Like people can't even imagine that it may be different one day
I mean they dont work is the issue
Not really.
They're unreliable.
they can often give false positives which is an issue, its not conclusive enough but its a basis to press an issue
"I did not kill john doe" *Detector detects stress patterns change* "we need to press the matter more"
Hot take: rights are a social construct, nothing more.
that is true i believe
They may be useful for social cohesion within a group of people
Or not
true, however groups tend to drive towards social structures that promote laws that promote group cohesion, and specifically allow purging of members in one way or another, to maintain cohesion
usually banishment
If a right serves a purpose we want then it is a useful tool. If it does not then it's a hindrance. That's what everyone thinks deep down
And yes they can be changed obviously they're changing all the time
I think we should bring back exile
Sure
Become a vagrant, and a vagabond.
Frowned upon everywhere you go.