It said to deal away with societal differences between men and women

That both are equal

i think i know what line you are talking about

it relates to modern industry and its blanket identifying of the working class as an instrument

I'd consider myself in favor of a fairly regulated Capitalism in order to include the vast majority of people and get them contributing to the society/innovation(as well as so they can benefit from it), which would mean some sort of affecting the rich, and giving to the poor(although I'm not sure with what yet), as it would all lead to social stability. Social progress would go from there, slowly, as to not cause volatility, and the degree that the economy is regulated would be debated as to fit with the current economic situation-fairly fluid but not going from Command to Laissez Faire kind of fluid. There would probably be as well an upper limit and lower limit to how much someone could make, and the wealth taken from past the upper limit would probably help sustain the people at the lower limit given they work hard.

So was Marx a supporter of the nuclear family?

@Doctor Anon Engels is the one who posited works of the nature of the family

and no he disagreed with the nuclear family as the basic economic unit of society

Chevo

Fucking commies hating the nuclear family

before you conflate, there is context to it

it is a largely comparative piece of man and wife to bourgeois and proletarian in an attempt to recognize the nature of societal liberation includes the liberation of the female sex: `...Then it will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and that this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society.`

What would be the alternative to monogamy?

it is not talking about the social nature of a family or sexuality

it is talking about the nuclear family as the economic unit of society

the smallest unit of access to production, consumption and exchange

Socially, monogamy would most likely still be the norm, otherwise, there would be significant social instability in the society.

we cannot forget when Ulrichs tried to shill his homosexual rights material to Engels and Marx and they laughed at him

That actually happened?

Lol

`When the pioneering German homosexual liberationist Karl Ulrichs sent Marx one of his books on the subject, which Marx forwarded to his collaborator, Engels described Ulrichs’s platform of homosexual emancipation from criminal laws as “turning smut into history.” Marx, in commenting on Karl Boruttau’s Gedanken über Gewissens Freiheit (Thoughts on Freedom of Conscience), disparaged the author as “this faggoty prick” (Schwanzschwulen). The homophobia of Marx and Engels has been meticulously documented by Hubert Kennedy of San Francisco State University, Ulrichs’s US biographer, in his essay “Johann Baptist von Schweitzer: The Queer Marx Loved to Hate,” which is included in the anthology Gay Men and the Sexual History of the Political Left, edited by Gert Hekma, Harry Oosterhuis, and James Steakley (Haworth Press) and is also available online.`

Failed back then, however it seems that the “proletariat’s” (social club for degenerates) struggle has turned in that direction

Your notions aside, there is a sharp divide in the socialist community on social issues

I actually didn't know about Ulrichs. I mostly know about Marx and his impact on sociology, as well as Marxist/Conflict theory as opposed to Funtionalist theory.

the communist presence in the US has long held that homosexuality was bourgeois capitalist decadence and the FBI has planted agents acting as transexual idealogues and the like in later decades

@Shalopy trust me you dont want to know about ulrichs

shameless faggot that somehow didnt get hanged along the way

That's very interesting.

That definitely makes sense, and it also makes sense that Communists would align themselves with all groups who have been marginalized.

for sure they have

but there is a clear difference between intersectional garbage and self-determination of peoples

Are there any brands of Communism that allows for theism? Generally Communism is Atheistic, I believe Marx once said that religion was the opiate of the masses.

That statement by Marx wasn't so much an atheistic comment but as a comparative device as something the working class holds onto as a sponge for hope

but marxism is usually atheistic and definitely is from Lenin on

if we combine his philosophy in whole from the Theses of Feuerbach on

But if you look at Marx via the epistemological break as noted by Althusser, which i believe in, one can depart from his philosophy and his worldy epistemic works and his material analyses of material functions and critique of the political economy

it's materialist in so far as there is material to study and apply to material and can easily be meshed with theism

Couldn't Marxism/Communism be similar to a sort of theism due a higher goal/vision of the proletarian and the emotional connection through that?

i get what youre trying to say

but i think it's more of the seemingly mystical awe that eschatology and marxist palingenesis both inspire