Message from @Slendy
Discord ID: 456302191653683210
That’s what I mean by provably falsifiable
If it is wrong, then one can prove it
It seems like a pretty solid definition of what makes a religion, as the attempt of it is to try to comprehend truth. But there also exist paradoxes too from our lack of understanding
So it's ideology is narrow minded despite it's efforts of trying to make sense of the order of nature
Yeah, the fix to most parodoxes in this case though would be to study further and absorb more information
that too can help with advancements
Exactly
You guys catch on fast
Most of the people I try to talk to about this seem mostly from r/atheism
fuck plebbit honestly lol
Damn straight
yknow I wonder with the idea of a transcendental law or being romantics would talk about, what does that imply for freewill?
It implies free will exists
one, because we can chose to disobey the transcendent laws
two, because if humans have a nature and only that nature we hove no capacity to seek the truth, and many of us have sought the truth
I might be confusing transcendentalism for Immanence with the orders of nature
Free will isn’t real
Cause and effect prevents it from existing
how so?
All decisions come from influences
so you're telling me that as an automaton?
And everyone makes decisions in a certain way depending on their brain
then how is it the moment i make a truth claim or seek out the truth i rise above predeterminalism?
Can something come out from a vacuum?
the laws of entropy say no
watch this for some context to my arguments
i parasphrased him a little
A true vacuum can’t exist
also false
The decision making process is just multiple chemical reactions
It can be predicted
Not with current technology
But one choice can only be made
you mean the physical manifestation of free will can be
but not the free will itself
We’re not really the one deciding
No free will
i use my free will to disagree with you
It feels as if we are making decisions but it’s always the most logical outcome in its own way