It implies free will exists

one, because we can chose to disobey the transcendent laws

two, because if humans have a nature and only that nature we hove no capacity to seek the truth, and many of us have sought the truth

I might be confusing transcendentalism for Immanence with the orders of nature

Free will isn’t real

Cause and effect prevents it from existing

how so?

All decisions come from influences

We can’t make them without an influence

so you're telling me that as an automaton?

And everyone makes decisions in a certain way depending on their brain

then how is it the moment i make a truth claim or seek out the truth i rise above predeterminalism?

Can something come out from a vacuum?

the laws of entropy say no

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D64MiGLQ30w

watch this for some context to my arguments

i parasphrased him a little

A true vacuum can’t exist

also false

The decision making process is just multiple chemical reactions

It can be predicted

Not with current technology

But one choice can only be made

you mean the physical manifestation of free will can be

but not the free will itself

We’re not really the one deciding

No free will

i use my free will to disagree with you

It feels as if we are making decisions but it’s always the most logical outcome in its own way

You don’t really get to choose

Me messages are causing you to say that

then why is the argument here arbitrary?

My*

Are you choosing to say what you say for a reason?

not really

That can’t be true

There isn’t always deeper meaning

i simply chose to disagree with you

There’s a reason you disagree with me

It’s not random

i have no reason to disagree with you other than i disagree with you