@Rob Travis (Mason) this is literally true

sure

we would feed him before he felt the need to steal

But this is not the case. It never has been and it never will.

let me clarify

never have an ideology judged on its imperfections

only on its stated principles

Never express your ideology based on its imperfections.

St. Thomas of Aquinas is all the moral philosophy necessary to be sound and true

punishment for immoral actions must be relative

>implying punishment has even been brought up on our end

which is why we have different punishment for different crimes and how severe

>implying you have a monopoly on what is and is not discussed

>implying that this isn't a contained discussion between 4 people with 2 people falling relatively together

in each group

Doesn't imply that at all.

You're just making implications everywhere aren't you?

he literally sees in black and white

black, white, and grey

1. bad
2. good
3. passive

3 distinct groups

im the one who sees in black and white

in terms of morals

I'm sure me and John disagree on a lot.

Josh.

Same thing.

whos john

anything that isn't a moral question is "passive"

A Nazi weightlifter friend of mine.

💪

>implying something cant be between bad and pasive

ommisian of truth for instance

nothing can be between bad and passive because if something is passive, it is not within the realm of morality

inaction can sometimes be wrong, keep that in mind

are you one of those crazies that doesnt think black truths are bad.

black truths? ive never heard of that

please elaborate

>black truth

lashing hara

a black truth is like me calling you stupid because you dont know what they are technically Im not wrong

but its rude