Message from @εïз irma εïз

Discord ID: 456678599995555840


2018-06-14 04:34:50 UTC  

I even notice... "similarities" and "patterns" more than most people.

2018-06-14 04:35:00 UTC  

even among the "alt right and new right"

2018-06-14 04:35:05 UTC  

Theres "archtypes"

2018-06-14 04:35:45 UTC  

Some people will have similar voices looks, mannerisms ect.

2018-06-14 04:35:50 UTC  

You're not nearly as profound as you think you are.

2018-06-14 04:35:51 UTC  

Personality types...

2018-06-14 04:36:04 UTC  

Nah man I just... notice fucking patterns.

2018-06-14 04:36:19 UTC  

Humans tend to do that. It's widely acknowledged.

2018-06-14 04:36:37 UTC  

Funny how we came full circle right back to psychology.

2018-06-14 04:36:49 UTC  

Maybe they stem from your inner self, these archetypes being ingrained in your subconscious since development. But hey, that's just pseudoscience 😉

2018-06-14 04:36:50 UTC  

Some people are archtypes.

2018-06-14 04:37:05 UTC  

>using Jung to categorize all psychology

2018-06-14 04:37:07 UTC  

Like I did see a guy... with MY SAME ONE when I was in a hospital.

2018-06-14 04:37:09 UTC  

im laffin

2018-06-14 04:37:15 UTC  

He even had the same eyes, way of talking mannerism

2018-06-14 04:37:24 UTC  

He was like in his 50s shaven bald with a goatee.

2018-06-14 04:37:28 UTC  

>implying that i said anything about all psychology

2018-06-14 04:37:32 UTC  

It was weird.

2018-06-14 04:37:34 UTC  

Jung is harshly criticized for being unverifiable.

2018-06-14 04:37:38 UTC  

Cause HE seemed to notice.

2018-06-14 04:37:42 UTC  

And, would you look at that, pseudoscientific.

2018-06-14 04:37:51 UTC  

No shit, irma.

2018-06-14 04:38:05 UTC  

But Jung is definitely not representative of psychology.

2018-06-14 04:38:12 UTC  

Archtypes are pretty common throughout history and old stories and shit.

2018-06-14 04:38:19 UTC  

Did I say he was at any point?

2018-06-14 04:38:38 UTC  

Phenotypes also play into it too.

2018-06-14 04:38:51 UTC  

You seem to be reading a lot into what I'm saying that isn't necessarily there.

2018-06-14 04:38:55 UTC  

Well we were on the topic of psychology being pseudoscientific and then you went along and brought Jung into it? Guess you were only ACCIDENTALLY being inflammatory.

2018-06-14 04:38:56 UTC  

People are more likely to percieve a fat man as a "jolly guy".

2018-06-14 04:39:23 UTC  

Freud was actually a genius in his categorization of defense mechanisms and the basic mapping of development.

2018-06-14 04:39:45 UTC  

And Neo-Freudians threw out a lot of the crazy shit.

2018-06-14 04:39:53 UTC  

>Neo-Freudians

2018-06-14 04:39:55 UTC  

hahahahahaha

2018-06-14 04:40:01 UTC  

Lol

2018-06-14 04:40:01 UTC  

if you throw out all the crazy shit you just don't GET freud

2018-06-14 04:40:03 UTC  

the anal stage

2018-06-14 04:40:06 UTC  

the oral stage

2018-06-14 04:40:10 UTC  

his psychosexual stages

2018-06-14 04:40:12 UTC  

were all trash

2018-06-14 04:40:17 UTC  

?????????

2018-06-14 04:40:23 UTC  

Yeah Neo-Freudians generally reject that.