>implying that i said anything about all psychology

It was weird.

Jung is harshly criticized for being unverifiable.

Cause HE seemed to notice.

And, would you look at that, pseudoscientific.

No shit, irma.

But Jung is definitely not representative of psychology.

Archtypes are pretty common throughout history and old stories and shit.

Did I say he was at any point?

Phenotypes also play into it too.

You seem to be reading a lot into what I'm saying that isn't necessarily there.

Well we were on the topic of psychology being pseudoscientific and then you went along and brought Jung into it? Guess you were only ACCIDENTALLY being inflammatory.

People are more likely to percieve a fat man as a "jolly guy".

Freud was actually a genius in his categorization of defense mechanisms and the basic mapping of development.

And Neo-Freudians threw out a lot of the crazy shit.

>Neo-Freudians

hahahahahaha

Lol

if you throw out all the crazy shit you just don't GET freud

the anal stage

the oral stage

his psychosexual stages

were all trash

?????????

Yeah Neo-Freudians generally reject that.

God he'd have a field day with "fetishes" nowadays

He's be looking online and see people with anime porn fetish, pony fetish, furry fetish, feeder fetish, inflation fetish, rubber fetish ect

my crypto group just joined a weird fetish server we are raiding

Freud laid the groundwork for what the Neo-Freudians would refine into respectable psychology and not what was perceived as the ramblings of a perverted old man.

I wonder HOW THE FUCK he'd react to that shit

Have you read anything by him instead of relying on others? @Rex Colt

A few things.

Like by chance

they are obsessed with the blueberry girl from willy wonka

Ah, that's good.

Oh god I know that group

hahahaha

Theres like

Tons of porn of her

🤔

On deviant art.