Takes time. That's all.

Hey listen

All i know is

is that I hate everyone

Take the otterpill faggot.

The problem is stupid people like @Jay1532 are also incredibly narcissistic and BELIEVE THEMSELVES TO BE CORRECT, because it validates their fragile little egos that cling desperately to a belief that they have some small sense of superiority.

The only recourse is to shame them and mock them.

gee if i didnt know any better that would sound exactly like a psychological projection, my dude

Stupid people lack enough awareness @Deleted User

When you're mocking them it effectively does nothing because they don't even recognize they're being mocked and Shamed

"There is nothing memetic about me. I actually do happen to be one of the most cultured and intelligent men in Europe.....that`s just a fact..."

so many in this chatroom clearly cant distinguish between someone imparting arduously acquired knowledge and bored dumb mediocrioties dribbling shit onto the screen

@Deleted User PIN THIS

still waiting for you to make a single positive claim about anything. So where is this knowledge you sweat and bled for? [citation missing]

@Jay1532 I ALREADY CALLED OUT IRMA FOR BUTCHERING ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY

but instead of engaging me in debate, you people pile on me to redeem your egos.

I just looked up "inbred Jew" and behold Otter was the first image.

then you proceed to call me "self-aggrandising" when all you have done is IGNORE my criticisms and turn the discussion into shitflinging

that was what, over an hour ago? And youve been trying to milk that claim all this time? Besides, that doesnt fit the definition of a positive claim. You simply criticized someone else's claim. Color me stunned that a jew would only know how to criticize.

when I respond in kind and insult you more cleverly hurting your little prepubescent sense of manhood, does that mean I have not imparted arduously acquired knowledge just because you CHOSE TO IGNORE IT?

And it's not even good enough criticism either.

Seeing as how actual criticism would offer various untried solutions to the problem at hand.

To me it seems as if he's going on a tangent.

There's NO SOLUTION when the entire question is build on an INCORRECT FRAMEWORK

Elaborate.

the question has to be amended first, you vapid ignoramus.

do you see anything wrong with this question???

because there are NUMEROUS things wrong with it

how is a uestion wrong

^

It was conceived in the mind of a charlatan who has NEVER READ PHILOSOPHY

the uestion isn't the answer

There are no bad or wrong questions.

also, I'm leaing stuff out because some of my keys don't work on my keyboard

How are you still on this Otter?

He sounds very upset about something quite trivial.

The question is meant to be broad, the dichotomy between objective-based morality and subjective-based morality.

What is the difference between a cockroach's 2nd stomach and their cold-blooded exoskeleton?

is a pretty bad question

because it MAKES NO BIOLOGICAL SENSE