Message from @JogaFlame
Discord ID: 487113958617251841
still waiting for you to make a single positive claim about anything. So where is this knowledge you sweat and bled for? [citation missing]
@Jay1532 I ALREADY CALLED OUT IRMA FOR BUTCHERING ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY
but instead of engaging me in debate, you people pile on me to redeem your egos.
I just looked up "inbred Jew" and behold Otter was the first image.
then you proceed to call me "self-aggrandising" when all you have done is IGNORE my criticisms and turn the discussion into shitflinging
that was what, over an hour ago? And youve been trying to milk that claim all this time? Besides, that doesnt fit the definition of a positive claim. You simply criticized someone else's claim. Color me stunned that a jew would only know how to criticize.
when I respond in kind and insult you more cleverly hurting your little prepubescent sense of manhood, does that mean I have not imparted arduously acquired knowledge just because you CHOSE TO IGNORE IT?
And it's not even good enough criticism either.
Seeing as how actual criticism would offer various untried solutions to the problem at hand.
To me it seems as if he's going on a tangent.
There's NO SOLUTION when the entire question is build on an INCORRECT FRAMEWORK
Elaborate.
the question has to be amended first, you vapid ignoramus.
do you see anything wrong with this question???
because there are NUMEROUS things wrong with it
how is a uestion wrong
^
It was conceived in the mind of a charlatan who has NEVER READ PHILOSOPHY
the uestion isn't the answer
also, I'm leaing stuff out because some of my keys don't work on my keyboard
How are you still on this Otter?
He sounds very upset about something quite trivial.
The question is meant to be broad, the dichotomy between objective-based morality and subjective-based morality.
What is the difference between a cockroach's 2nd stomach and their cold-blooded exoskeleton?
is a pretty bad question
because it MAKES NO BIOLOGICAL SENSE
well irma didn't ask a uestion about biology
the same way her question is bad because it completely misrepresents philosophical concepts.
And how does that relate at all towards morality.
You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand the question.
IT'S A FUCKING METAPHOR YOU IDIOT
kek I know
Statistically you would be in the wrong in asserting it's a bad question.
WRONG.
Making no sense does not mean the same as misrepresentation.
You do not understand what is WRONG with the question
You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand the question.
UTILITARIAN ETHICS ARE NOT RELATIVIST FIRST OF ALL
Nobody else had problems processing it.