I just looked up "inbred Jew" and behold Otter was the first image.

then you proceed to call me "self-aggrandising" when all you have done is IGNORE my criticisms and turn the discussion into shitflinging

that was what, over an hour ago? And youve been trying to milk that claim all this time? Besides, that doesnt fit the definition of a positive claim. You simply criticized someone else's claim. Color me stunned that a jew would only know how to criticize.

when I respond in kind and insult you more cleverly hurting your little prepubescent sense of manhood, does that mean I have not imparted arduously acquired knowledge just because you CHOSE TO IGNORE IT?

And it's not even good enough criticism either.

Seeing as how actual criticism would offer various untried solutions to the problem at hand.

To me it seems as if he's going on a tangent.

There's NO SOLUTION when the entire question is build on an INCORRECT FRAMEWORK

Elaborate.

the question has to be amended first, you vapid ignoramus.

do you see anything wrong with this question???

because there are NUMEROUS things wrong with it

how is a uestion wrong

^

It was conceived in the mind of a charlatan who has NEVER READ PHILOSOPHY

the uestion isn't the answer

There are no bad or wrong questions.

also, I'm leaing stuff out because some of my keys don't work on my keyboard

How are you still on this Otter?

He sounds very upset about something quite trivial.

The question is meant to be broad, the dichotomy between objective-based morality and subjective-based morality.

What is the difference between a cockroach's 2nd stomach and their cold-blooded exoskeleton?

is a pretty bad question

because it MAKES NO BIOLOGICAL SENSE

well irma didn't ask a uestion about biology

the same way her question is bad because it completely misrepresents philosophical concepts.

And how does that relate at all towards morality.

You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand the question.

IT'S A FUCKING METAPHOR YOU IDIOT

kek I know

Statistically you would be in the wrong in asserting it's a bad question.

WRONG.

Making no sense does not mean the same as misrepresentation.

You do not understand what is WRONG with the question

You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand the question.

UTILITARIAN ETHICS ARE NOT RELATIVIST FIRST OF ALL

Nobody else had problems processing it.

video just leaked of otter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha7smLPz2GY

WHY WOULD YOU EVEN LUMP THOSE TWO CATEGORIES TOGETHER