BECAUSE THEY ARE APPLYING EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONCERNS TO ETHICS
WHICH MAKES NO SENSE
Because then he wouldn't have a reason to go off on a tangent.
IT DOESN'T APPLY
Justin, the word you're looking for is strawman.
THE WHOLE FRAMEWORK BETRAYS A TOTAL MISCOMPREHENSION OF PHILOSOPHY
IT'S NOT A STRAWMAN
Turn off caps lock
@εïз irma εïз I am not "trolling you" or "shitposting"
I was afraid of being incorrect. @εïз irma εïз
I am pointing out a fatal misunderstanding of ethics
Was thinking of that word however
Can you not indulge yourself in some mental gymnastics or flawed theoretical questions? @Deleted User
Being afraid of incorrect will turn you into something like Otter.
I love being incorrect
@CrowGoCaw listen here, you little shit, I have a doctorate in this field.
It's not mental gymnastics
It's a complete misunderstanding of ethics.
It means an opportunity to learn
see
just like a said
Well now that you cleared that up you're in the right
But you're going on about loose ends,
and just because EVERYONE misunderstood does not makei t correct.
Take the otterpill.
Carry on @Deleted User
WOW EVERYONE DIDNT UNDERSTAND AND CONTINUED TO SPEAK IGNORANTLY
Is otter a furry
IT MUST BE OKAY!
the question is interpreted perfectly as intended by others who have observed it.
eurofags like when someone is a scholar
but they don't care about proof
gay
no u
fuck
Who and why the fuck has a green role
Otter could very well be a furry.
It was not interpreted perfectly
Otter has transcended autism
High IQ
It was a discussion of the blind leading the blind.
