Message from @JogaFlame
Discord ID: 487115153566072852
You're getting very twisted over this.
Calm down Otter.
^
UTILITARIAN ARGUMENTS ARE CONSEQUENTIALIST
It is never that serious.
Turn off your caps lock.
HOW ARE YOU EVEN DEFENDING THIS LEVEL OF IGNORANCE
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE
THOSE ARE EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONCERNS
NOT ETHICAL CONCERNS
Because practically smashing your keyboard and typing in all caps does not help you out.
YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHILOSOPHY
Calm down.
otter in new york
who cares about the specifics if people understand the question
if at the end of the day it all means the same thing why bother with the loose ends
BECAUSE THEY ARE APPLYING EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONCERNS TO ETHICS
WHICH MAKES NO SENSE
IT DOESN'T APPLY
Justin, the word you're looking for is strawman.
THE WHOLE FRAMEWORK BETRAYS A TOTAL MISCOMPREHENSION OF PHILOSOPHY
IT'S NOT A STRAWMAN
Turn off caps lock
@εïз irma εïз I am not "trolling you" or "shitposting"
I was afraid of being incorrect. @εïз irma εïз
I am pointing out a fatal misunderstanding of ethics
Was thinking of that word however
Can you not indulge yourself in some mental gymnastics or flawed theoretical questions? @Deleted User
Being afraid of incorrect will turn you into something like Otter.
I love being incorrect
@CrowGoCaw listen here, you little shit, I have a doctorate in this field.
It's not mental gymnastics
It's a complete misunderstanding of ethics.
It means an opportunity to learn
see
just like a said
Well now that you cleared that up you're in the right
But you're going on about loose ends,