NOT ETHICAL CONCERNS

Because practically smashing your keyboard and typing in all caps does not help you out.

YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHILOSOPHY

@εïз irma εïз

Calm down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha7smLPz2GY

otter in new york

who cares about the specifics if people understand the question

if at the end of the day it all means the same thing why bother with the loose ends

BECAUSE THEY ARE APPLYING EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONCERNS TO ETHICS

WHICH MAKES NO SENSE

Because then he wouldn't have a reason to go off on a tangent.

IT DOESN'T APPLY

Justin, the word you're looking for is strawman.

THE WHOLE FRAMEWORK BETRAYS A TOTAL MISCOMPREHENSION OF PHILOSOPHY

IT'S NOT A STRAWMAN

Turn off caps lock

@εïз irma εïз I am not "trolling you" or "shitposting"

I was afraid of being incorrect. @εïз irma εïз

I am pointing out a fatal misunderstanding of ethics

Was thinking of that word however

Can you not indulge yourself in some mental gymnastics or flawed theoretical questions? @Deleted User

Being afraid of incorrect will turn you into something like Otter.

I love being incorrect

@CrowGoCaw listen here, you little shit, I have a doctorate in this field.

It's not mental gymnastics

It's a complete misunderstanding of ethics.

It means an opportunity to learn

see

just like a said

Well now that you cleared that up you're in the right

But you're going on about loose ends,

and just because EVERYONE misunderstood does not makei t correct.

Take the otterpill.

Carry on @Deleted User

WOW EVERYONE DIDNT UNDERSTAND AND CONTINUED TO SPEAK IGNORANTLY

Is otter a furry

IT MUST BE OKAY!

the question is interpreted perfectly as intended by others who have observed it.

eurofags like when someone is a scholar

but they don't care about proof