Message from @Seán
Discord ID: 496044944381968395
as opposed to??
like just becoming kind of immune to the law in most cases, richer than the other races there etc
not like annexation and stuff
>conquering
that’s a strange word to use for that then
"so you think that there is even a slither of a chance of pakistan defeating the entire of the eu and nato to invade england on their own territory just because less than 4% of their population is pakistani"
nigger what
1: the UK including england left the EU
BREXIT
even if they didn't leave
the EU would probably let britain be invaded by sand niggers because diversity
dunno about nato
"also ‘pc culture’ generally doesn’t extend to supporting being forcefully annexed by an extremely conservative muslim country"
they ignore and allow muzzie rape gangs, i'm sure they would let themselves be partially conquered by sand niggers
Guess im just stupid xd
I'd say the US wouldnt let it happen but EU members of nato would probably
and Canada
jesus christ how detached from reality are you
yeah let’s just ignore the fact that all eu and nato countries are obliged to respond if one of their members is invaded
and the fact that the uk hasn’t even left the eu yet
and again, it’s fucking ridiculous to suggest than any country would be okay with being invaded because of diversity
they might be obliged to but they might be afraid of being called racists and etc, especially with those libtards in government
people are afraid to describe someone who's commited a crime because they're coloured that says a lot
i wouldnt be surprised if it extends to a government level
they’re okay with invading iraq and afghanistan, etc. without fear of being called racist so why would they be not okay with responding to being fucking invaded
that was a while back
before it took hold
how about syria then for something more recent
Syria is mostly a response to terrorism in their countries
from what I've heard
so you think that they wouldn’t respond to *being fucking invaded* if they would respond to terrorism
of course they would
but nato might not help them
is my point
>implying america wouldn’t jump on any possible opportunity to invade a country for oil
they haven't invaded Venezuela yet <:Monkas:459545654029713408>
i wonder why
i mean one of their closest allies being invaded would be the perfect excuse for them so
most invasions due to oil have been in the past, over a decade ago
as far as I'm aware Pakistan doesn't have much oil
well apparently pakistan has recently discovered a gigantic amount of oil but either way it’s just stupid to imply that the us wouldn’t respond to one of its closest allies being invaded
this is a stupid argument anyway why am i bothering
there is no way whatsoever that pakistan would be able to invade *and annex* england
oh
earlier I said the us would probably be one of the only ones to respond
most of western European Union countries probably wouldn't
that is unless of course you make every single variable as convenient to your point as you can
which is dumb