that was a while back

before it took hold

how about syria then for something more recent

for the most part they've actually withdrawn from Afghanistan

Syria is mostly a response to terrorism in their countries

from what I've heard

so you think that they wouldn’t respond to *being fucking invaded* if they would respond to terrorism

of course they would

but nato might not help them

is my point

>implying america wouldn’t jump on any possible opportunity to invade a country for oil

they haven't invaded Venezuela yet <:Monkas:459545654029713408>

i wonder why

i mean one of their closest allies being invaded would be the perfect excuse for them so

most invasions due to oil have been in the past, over a decade ago

as far as I'm aware Pakistan doesn't have much oil

well apparently pakistan has recently discovered a gigantic amount of oil but either way it’s just stupid to imply that the us wouldn’t respond to one of its closest allies being invaded

this is a stupid argument anyway why am i bothering

there is no way whatsoever that pakistan would be able to invade *and annex* england

oh

earlier I said the us would probably be one of the only ones to respond

most of western European Union countries probably wouldn't

that is unless of course you make every single variable as convenient to your point as you can

which is dumb

we can't exactly know what happens without seeing it.

or without thinking about it for more than two seconds

bruh

Pakistan is a meme country

and Pakistanis are a meme

they're just more inbred pajeets

@Seán "i think it was the terrain that beat the us"

And the Vietnamese are products of their environment, are they not?

An African or an Arab army would not have beat the US in the same conditions, just saying

true

The Vietnamese also beat the French before the Americans entered the war and the Chinese after we left

and the Cambodians

that's what I meant btw. if I'm getting it right, the Vietnamese knew the terrain and how to use it

They went to war with a lot of countries

a shit ton

I'd have to argue on that one

An African army, certainly not.

Arab army, i'd have to argue. I hate the Arabs, but they are good guerrilas. They could no way win a conventional war, but I certainly think they'd be able to put up a guirella one. Despite Afghans not being Arabs, look at them. Taliban after this long still exists, and they're thriving.