Message from @ham addition
Discord ID: 496047018079289355
for the most part they've actually withdrawn from Afghanistan
Syria is mostly a response to terrorism in their countries
from what I've heard
so you think that they wouldn’t respond to *being fucking invaded* if they would respond to terrorism
of course they would
but nato might not help them
is my point
>implying america wouldn’t jump on any possible opportunity to invade a country for oil
they haven't invaded Venezuela yet <:Monkas:459545654029713408>
i wonder why
i mean one of their closest allies being invaded would be the perfect excuse for them so
most invasions due to oil have been in the past, over a decade ago
as far as I'm aware Pakistan doesn't have much oil
well apparently pakistan has recently discovered a gigantic amount of oil but either way it’s just stupid to imply that the us wouldn’t respond to one of its closest allies being invaded
this is a stupid argument anyway why am i bothering
there is no way whatsoever that pakistan would be able to invade *and annex* england
oh
earlier I said the us would probably be one of the only ones to respond
most of western European Union countries probably wouldn't
that is unless of course you make every single variable as convenient to your point as you can
we can't exactly know what happens without seeing it.
or without thinking about it for more than two seconds
bruh
Pakistan is a meme country
and Pakistanis are a meme
they're just more inbred pajeets
@Seán "i think it was the terrain that beat the us"
And the Vietnamese are products of their environment, are they not?
An African or an Arab army would not have beat the US in the same conditions, just saying
true
The Vietnamese also beat the French before the Americans entered the war and the Chinese after we left
and the Cambodians
that's what I meant btw. if I'm getting it right, the Vietnamese knew the terrain and how to use it
They went to war with a lot of countries
a shit ton
I'd have to argue on that one
An African army, certainly not.
Arab army, i'd have to argue. I hate the Arabs, but they are good guerrilas. They could no way win a conventional war, but I certainly think they'd be able to put up a guirella one. Despite Afghans not being Arabs, look at them. Taliban after this long still exists, and they're thriving.
That's just my opinion on it though. Even with all these years of experience, I don't think the SAA could even beat a small European country in a conventional war, without the help of Russia or Iran. Arabs can't fight conventional wars, but they can certainly fight guirella ones.
guerrila*
sure, however you spell it.