Message from @Draco
Discord ID: 508789642213064775
Is this a Boomer civnat server?
Communism is a form of Marxism
Marxism is the analysis
Marxism is a self-claimed form of Communism
Communism is the answer to the problems raised by that analysis
Marxism says Proletariat are oppressed. Communism offers a way for them to gain power
Communism is a system philosophy independent from Marxist social commentary
Without oppression, the system design of communism still exists.
as briefly as possible, please explain what you believe communism is.
System design of Communism is grounded in the idea that the validity of Communal ownership is due to the exploitation of Proletariat.
*communist theories*
decentralized governance by aggregated consensus for common benefit
wew lad
you just typed out some random commie yabber, youre so smart
he asked for brief
thank you
your fault if you don't understand words
now tell me how fascism is defined any differently
that's the original point here
Fascism is not decentralized governance
im no expert on political theory, but fascism is usually very centralized, no?
Nor is it inherenetly defined by central authority.
So, what?
I already made that point.
Fascism is also not dependent on communal ownership
That possibility for central authority is the only possible differentiation
and it isn't necessary.
Nothing of that definition is necessary in Fascism
Nor is communism.
Once resources are allocated, they change ownership to the individual.
Much like Fascism.
Lol. No. The aggregated Consensus means that everyone owns the resources.
No, it means allocation is decided by the whole of society
Yes. If the whole society gets to vote on my stuff, how is that my stuff?
Post-allocation
Even after allocation, society can vote to take that out of my hands
That's autistic.
And not the point or intention
You are one making the defintional case and then complaining about autistic comparison. Neat
You also presented your own definition.