ion
Discord ID: 304914429407920129
74 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
I wonder (((why)))
There isn't a single Manx Gaelic -> English translator on the internet.
(((they're))) erasing pagan identity
then why'd you try to kill him rommel?
the wall should have a maglev train and thorium lftrs tbh
>they'll just dig tunnels
yeah bc hamas has had so much luck with that strat
the only genocide that happened during WW2 was of lice
is this a civnat server?
was it the jews or the freemasons who made hitler arrest and ransom the rothschilds and seize their banks?
nice meme
le 56% only
they're all circumsized
japs are unironically honorary aryans
this is actually a civnat server
racialism
Fascism and Communism are the same thing. Prove me wrong.
At their core, both reallocate resources to serve the common good
The only debatable difference is who does the reallocating, but fascism isnโt inherently defined by a central authority
So no difference
Jews rock!
Assad is a perfect white
Shadilay my fellow magapedes
Based jews are our greatest allies
Based bot
The casualties were infinite when calculating loss of potential progeny
steinbergowitz
!play siege audiobook
really? the server owner is the sperg spamming ifunny?
based
Fascism and Communism are the same thing. Prove me wrong.
In practice, both reallocate resources and implement policy for common benefit.
While Fascism isn't inherently defined by having central authority, it can, and that's the only potential differentiation.
Historically maybe, but I'm talking ideologically, on paper, there is no difference.
Invoking historical examples doesn't speak to ideological principles.
Hitler, of course.
Communism doesn't rely on an existing power structure to redistribute wealth from oppressors to the oppressed, this is not a defining feature, as a Communistic society could theoretically be created without.
And yes, he was the greatest.
No, that's a historic feature of attempted Communism. Again, I'm talking about the core ideological philosophies.
The World will know he was right.
Marxism is not Communism, and he was a Capitalistic Rothschild conman.
Is this a Boomer civnat server?
Marxism is a self-claimed form of Communism
Communism is a system philosophy independent from Marxist social commentary
Without oppression, the system design of communism still exists.
decentralized governance by aggregated consensus for common benefit
he asked for brief
your fault if you don't understand words
now tell me how fascism is defined any differently
that's the original point here
Nor is it inherenetly defined by central authority.
I already made that point.
That possibility for central authority is the only possible differentiation
and it isn't necessary.
Nor is communism.
Once resources are allocated, they change ownership to the individual.
Much like Fascism.
No, it means allocation is decided by the whole of society
Post-allocation
That's autistic.
And not the point or intention
You also presented your own definition.
You debate like a Jew.
In what sense?
You didn't show a difference other than the one *possible* differentiator I had already mentioned.
possible, but not necessary.
@OMEGA wtf are you doing here?
The Jews only carry out the inherent will of Capitalism
If not them, another group.
Within AnSyn, the jewish genetic affinity for manipulation is neutered.
Jinzis being conservative is a meme, they're just anti-sjw.
Vote White
74 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1