Communism's defining feature is that Proletariat seize resources from bourgeosie.
And if you think Hitker was the greatest thinker of Fascism, then I have nothing more to say

he will be forever remembered in History

his name will outlive humanity

No, that's a historic feature of attempted Communism. Again, I'm talking about the core ideological philosophies.

The World will know he was right.

Marx wrote that in his own works. That is not attempted Communism.

Marxism is not Communism, and he was a Capitalistic Rothschild conman.

Is this a Boomer civnat server?

Communism is a form of Marxism

Marxism is the analysis

Marxism is a self-claimed form of Communism

Communism is the answer to the problems raised by that analysis

Marxism says Proletariat are oppressed. Communism offers a way for them to gain power

Communism is a system philosophy independent from Marxist social commentary

Without oppression, the system design of communism still exists.

as briefly as possible, please explain what you believe communism is.

System design of Communism is grounded in the idea that the validity of Communal ownership is due to the exploitation of Proletariat.

*communist theories*

decentralized governance by aggregated consensus for common benefit

wew lad

you just typed out some random commie yabber, youre so smart

he asked for brief

thank you

your fault if you don't understand words

now tell me how fascism is defined any differently

that's the original point here

Fascism is not decentralized governance

For one

im no expert on political theory, but fascism is usually very centralized, no?

Nor is it inherenetly defined by central authority.

So, what?

I already made that point.

Fascism is also not dependent on communal ownership

That possibility for central authority is the only possible differentiation

and it isn't necessary.

Nothing of that definition is necessary in Fascism

Nor is communism.

Once resources are allocated, they change ownership to the individual.

Much like Fascism.

Lol. No. The aggregated Consensus means that everyone owns the resources.

No, it means allocation is decided by the whole of society