He was no way an anti Semite

Communism doesn’t wanna overthrow the rich

It’s basically a system in which the international bankers can take over and rule on everyone

```The free development of individualities, and hence not the reduction of necessary labour time so as to posit surplus labour, but rather the general reduction of the necessary labour of society to a minimum, which then corresponds to the artistic, scientific etc. development of the individuals in the time set free, and with the means created, for all of them.```

development of individualities?

what is the logical meaning of that?

indivduality - "individual characteristics."

nah

how can you fucking develop individual charateristics

it doesnt make any sense

you cant progress in having individual characteristics

it doesnt make any sense

but communism was co-opted by Jews

you either have some sort of characteristic traits or not, that sentence doesnt present any value to me

I guy was talking to brought up an interesting point

When a great civilization remains pure of culture and people, it seems to flourish.

Wheb that civilization opens it borders it increases tensions but dosent really collapse

so this turned into a Da JOOZ and an idiot who cant understand english

spewing

I cant understand english? surplus value doesnt even exist as a term

but when the nation realizes it is being replaced and try to correct it, they fall

the official term is value added

it doesnt even make much sense to call it "above plus" value
because what the fuck
you cant be above plus

you can be only on plus or on minus

surplus value is the value of labor in excess to the reproduction of labor power

aka the wage

you ooze stupid

the term should be called
"surzero value"
or something similar to that
```sur-
prefix
​
over or above:```

who is a fucking idiot

your guru marx couldnt even compose logically viable terms

you cant be over plus

over plus means to infinity you fucking idiot

it not even to infinity

it isnt even above plus, there is no such a thing as above plus

@el pebble

you can be either at ZERO that isnt either negative nor positive or you can be below or above zero which could be at most called the point of economical balance when cost of producing an item is equal to the cost of that item, so that cost covers only the neccessary production cost

your fucking marx gay faggot

couldnt even compose fucking economical terms

you are trying too hard to say something of substance

but are saying nothing