so this turned into a Da JOOZ and an idiot who cant understand english

spewing

I cant understand english? surplus value doesnt even exist as a term

but when the nation realizes it is being replaced and try to correct it, they fall

the official term is value added

it doesnt even make much sense to call it "above plus" value
because what the fuck
you cant be above plus

you can be only on plus or on minus

surplus value is the value of labor in excess to the reproduction of labor power

aka the wage

you ooze stupid

the term should be called
"surzero value"
or something similar to that
```sur-
prefix
​
over or above:```

who is a fucking idiot

your guru marx couldnt even compose logically viable terms

you cant be over plus

over plus means to infinity you fucking idiot

it not even to infinity

it isnt even above plus, there is no such a thing as above plus

@el pebble

you can be either at ZERO that isnt either negative nor positive or you can be below or above zero which could be at most called the point of economical balance when cost of producing an item is equal to the cost of that item, so that cost covers only the neccessary production cost

your fucking marx gay faggot

couldnt even compose fucking economical terms

you are trying too hard to say something of substance

but are saying nothing

your fucking quote had no value

surplus is an oxymoron

and marx is a fucking meme

surplus value is the value that is in surplus to what the worker receives in the form of a wage

it is a simple term

you clearly dont speak english

I guess that my disagreement comes from english being autistic

it first defines sur prefix as meaning something above

and one cannot be above plus

it is logically not viable

no you are not understanding the english language

you cant be fucking above plus

surplus means excess

but sur prefix means above

this term consists of a word and a prefix

i dont see why thats an issue

above what is necessary is an excess