Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 519965099595792388
Mises was a fag
Mises
lmao
Private property can exist without regulation
You're conflating ownership with regulation
yes it can
no I'm saying regulation is socialist
nobody said anything to the contrary
@Doctor Anon Define state capitalism
oh this guy did
Regulations are not capitalist
nor is "state capitalism" a thing
That's not contradictory to what you just said @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
How so?
Something being a product of capitalism does not mean he thinks capitalism can't exist without it
it can
Regulations are a capitalist invention <:unequal:473954748517842954> regulations are capitalist
And he even made the distinction
it is a product of socialism
Okay, why is it not? We're going in circles
regulations ARE socialist
those are socialist policies
Let's first distinguish regulation from ownership
Yes
regulation existing where property is privately owned
I know I'm not saying ownership is regulation
okay
I'm saying regulation is a product of socialism
A capitalist economy is a free market economy
You therefore need private property to implement regulation
Thats why a capitalist economy has never existed
Protecting people from lies from corporations isn't socialism lmao
lies?
ok you're not understanding
Regulations are inherently socialist
Corporations are inheritly self interested
That's fact
Where is the nazbol when you need him, he's actually well informed on this @Doctor Anon