In order for there to be regulation, you need private property

Legendary economists like Friedman and Mises agree with me

???

Mises was a fag

Mises

lmao

Private property can exist without regulation

You're conflating ownership with regulation

yes it can

no I'm saying regulation is socialist

nobody said anything to the contrary

@Doctor Anon Define state capitalism

oh this guy did

Regulations are not capitalist

nor is "state capitalism" a thing

That's not contradictory to what you just said @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

How so?

Something being a product of capitalism does not mean he thinks capitalism can't exist without it

it can

Regulations are a capitalist invention <:unequal:473954748517842954> regulations are capitalist

And he even made the distinction

It is not a product of capitalism

it is a product of socialism

Okay, why is it not? We're going in circles

regulations ARE socialist

those are socialist policies

Let's first distinguish regulation from ownership

Yes

regulation existing where property is privately owned

I know I'm not saying ownership is regulation

okay

I'm saying regulation is a product of socialism

A capitalist economy is a free market economy

You therefore need private property to implement regulation

Thats why a capitalist economy has never existed

Protecting people from lies from corporations isn't socialism lmao

lies?

ok you're not understanding

Regulations are inherently socialist