Message from @ritasuma
Discord ID: 520633882761232386
Is socialist
Yes they were
And any regulation was against employees
They were extremely regulated
And were supportive of the companies
economic freedom doesnt mean much
Extremely supportive
Hi
Except they were extremely regulated
a mutualist society would have high levels of economic freedom
yet would be socialist
Nope
The privatised steel industry was massive for Hitler
^
It appears one doesn’t understand economic freedom
he mass privatized and supported krupp and all
And he over controlled it though state intervention
state/socialism
so it was only privatisation in name
State socialism is socialism
What the fuck are you talking about
LOL
it can
mutualism for example
free market can still exist in socialist societies
Complete contradiction
@Diode over regulated by the state
Price controls etc
that’s socialist
read up on mutualism friend
1 sec lemme quote
means of production are completely owned by the workers
For a start you haven’t actually said any evidence of this so called overregulation
however, a free market is omnipresent
You’ve said things that aren’t indicative of capitalism or socialism
You’ve said things that are generally authoritarian
That’s not how that works
The regulation was all applied to the workers
“What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive.”