Saying it’s just like that isn’t a proper argument

Yes it does

lol

lets say workers ownt he means of production through cooperatives

Socialism literally strong state intervention

where is the state needed there

but whether or not you call it socialism is literally purely semantic

anarcho is a synonym with "stupid"

Wow now you said it again I’m convinced

I’m a tankie now

Definitely love the state

anarcho-communism = stupid communism
anarcho-capitalism = stupid capitalism

see, proof

@riacan shut it cracker

@riacan

<:coolpepe:505880386467921921>

@ritasuma the state would need to regulate it until it transitions into a stateless society such as communism

Lol

anarcho-Att

I don't get why everyone thinks communism has to be stateless

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ that is a purely marxist leninst interpretation of socialism

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ because the workers can’t overthrow the state, and transition to anarchism

Your right mate how dumb of men

Because that’s how it is

Me*

you do realise when marx blabbered on about no state he was talking about something post what we consider communism?

I’m so glad your a spitter of truth

he was practically discussing anarcho-communism

Fucking cultural Marxists

@Diode yes that’s another method

because thats how it was defined by both pre marxist communists and marx and its how almost all leftists use the term? @riacan

However the other way of going to stateless is socialism

it's also wrong

Your way is anarcho communism

The end goal of communism is anarchism in a sense

there’s 2 ways

no it’s communism

The end goal of a of socialism however is communism

And socialism does this by strong state intervention in the economy

Communism- “a moneyless classless stateless society”

yes