Message from @Priyanka
Discord ID: 567189208175869952
You get 1/10 for using that poor 'you must be projecting' deflection.
What are you, a homo sympathiser?
calling someone sexually parasitic out of nowhere is pretty fucking suspect
Really? Is it?
I like the violin. @FlipppyyJr
Lmfao.
@Deleted User It was a thing, though they recently made it illegal. Around 5-10% practiced it
Fenrir's texts are so outlandish they're comical at this point
@Alric the Bretwalda The "parasite" is the self-proclaimed "Christian" who wants concubines and genocide. If you care this much about Christianity, pick up the Bible and read
@Priyanka Polygamy and concubinage is hardly radical from a natural aristocrat worldview. As for genocide; you advocate that today with your multiculturalism and invasion of Western countries. I simply wish for homogeneous nations; people living among their own.
National defence is self defence, protecting a sacred homeland from invaders hardly goes against Biblical teachings
@Alric the Bretwalda Concubinage is adultery. Having a mistress is cheating. Genesis clearly says 2 become one flesh. That's what marriage is.
Secondly, you said I advocate invasion and multiculturalism, which is far from the truth. You have to resort to lies because you realize your behavior is not reflective of Jesus' teachings. Hypocrites have to resort to petty techniques.
You don't wish for homogeneous nations alone. You wanted to shed blood for no reason and invade other nations + take their resources. Theft, murder, adultery, pride, etc. What else you got? Keep pretending to be a Christian.
^
seems fair enough, ethno-nationalism doesnt necessitate imperialism
also ive had the Christian argument concerning polygamy before and the New Testament seems pretty clear that its against it
You are not a Christian, Rand.
Jesus basically denied that
im not, right but i can read and be honest to the text
I don't think you can.
But why don't you actually paste the verses so I can refute them before you go on making more bold assertions.
although i largely fall in line with very traditional latin and orthodox Christian teachings
heres the link
Christianity...that one religion where anyone can redefine it apparently.
8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
This simply refers to divorce. To put away your wife to marry another.
this also carries over to take on multiple wives
How do you compatibilise such a teaching with other verses where God clearly condones polygamy?
“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
"So they are no longer two, but one flesh" - what part of this is hard to understand?
I don't regard that as an argument for monogamy.
supersessionism is the common interpretation
That's hyper-literalism, reading into the text something you wish to read.