Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 583428068866129958
Because of definition. right?
hebephilia isn't pedophilia libtard
@Deleted User please don't insult me. I'm just trying to have a nice debate.
LOL
it is a hypothetical question.
it can be a 78 year old
it's still hebephilia
Mitch. are u trolling me? u aren't really a map right?
what is semantics?
I legit thought Mitch was banned
Not mitch
I thought A Hero was banned
i never defended it
i just said what it was
@Deleted User has had their image permissions restricted.
that's pretty cringe bro
I'm having a hard time understanding what's going on
And Mitch. I know you don't defend it.
I want to debate this to see if I was right and it seems I'm right. A 55 year old man isn't a pedo for dating a 14, 15, 16, or 17 year old. They are considered ephebophilia which is still wrong.
what is semantics?
you shouldn't base morality on the law
but off the bible and book of mormon
@Daphene I understand. but you agree it isn't pedophilia and that is what I'm trying to get across. ik it's illegal.
ty. Daphene
@Deleted User well. I'm not trying to be autistic. lawls. what are semantics again?
to go to heaven you have to have at least 2 wives
sorry libtards but that's the rules
lmao
@Deleted User I can't tell if u r trolling or not. I believe u aren't a pedo.
@Daphene oh btw. I don't think that is hebophilia. That is ephebophilia.
I want to clarify that legality isn't part of the argument. ofc it is definitely wrong. wondering if he was a pedo is the argument and some of us agreed he wasn't due to definition.
I agree and know that already.
really. Spartans?
no way
I would assume it wouldn't be mostly a matriarchy
No