Not mitch

I thought A Hero was banned

i never defended it

i just said what it was

@Deleted User has had their image permissions restricted.

that's pretty cringe bro

I'm having a hard time understanding what's going on

And Mitch. I know you don't defend it.

I want to debate this to see if I was right and it seems I'm right. A 55 year old man isn't a pedo for dating a 14, 15, 16, or 17 year old. They are considered ephebophilia which is still wrong.

what's your guys thoughts on Theolibertarianism?

what is semantics?

you shouldn't base morality on the law

but off the bible and book of mormon

@Daphene I understand. but you agree it isn't pedophilia and that is what I'm trying to get across. ik it's illegal.

ty. Daphene

@Deleted User well. I'm not trying to be autistic. lawls. what are semantics again?

to go to heaven you have to have at least 2 wives

sorry libtards but that's the rules

lmao

@Deleted User I can't tell if u r trolling or not. I believe u aren't a pedo.

@Daphene oh btw. I don't think that is hebophilia. That is ephebophilia.

I want to clarify that legality isn't part of the argument. ofc it is definitely wrong. wondering if he was a pedo is the argument and some of us agreed he wasn't due to definition.

I agree and know that already.

really. Spartans?

no way

I would assume it wouldn't be mostly a matriarchy

No

@Deleted User True. hebophilia isn't pedophilia. But I was talking about ephebophilia.

Dude. what is wrong with ur messages?

@Daphene how are u today?

so based

what do you mean by "so based?"

ok boomer

What is up with Daphene? I think she ignores my messages. Maybe she is busy or doesn't like to talk to new people.

epic

Also, Mitch, what? U r confusing m

🤔