Should teens from 15 and up be allowed to watch porn legally but with restrictions

I wonder what most ppl think

About this question

Idk if it’s nsfw

No.

What leads one to that inquiry ¬ is the real question.

@Britney Spears 2.0💖 no you sick bastard

@Britney Spears 2.0💖
Stop promoting the consumption of porn, sex is solely for procreation.

If you're so base you cant find satisfaction elsewhere you don't deserve the title of human

^^^^ when you just commit the naturalistic fallacy like it ain't a big deal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SpWuseQGys

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cufG2Dlxvk

was there a raid?

haven't been in here awhile

whats been new?

yo

not much, in Politics arguing about gun shit

btw got a debate question @everyone can Foucault's theories be applied to Authoritarianism?

lol

I've written an essay describing why they can, lemme find it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QKciJYhi1k

hello there. new here, read rules and roles. how to start doing staff? what topics are the most discussed and/or "main"?

we just go from point to point

@Farao Ramses II race realism like 19th century anthropology is actually becoming more popular within the scientific consensus due to genetic research being done and PCA analysis on fst distance

Intriguing.

19th century anthropology is being vindicated

I believed we discussed that before though.

maybe

We talked about sub-populations and what not.

I don't recall the exact details or meat of the conversation, but I do recall that it didn't change my stance in regard to my politics, considering an appeal to the science was very much an appeal to nature.

In other words: to me it seems like one giant naturalistic fallacy.

no, not really, categories are only justified through the utility but the common argument against race realism is that it doesnt comport with nature

now its obvious it does

now what you ought to do with that information is different

I conceded that point to an extend if I recall correctly. But again: unclear on the details.

but whatever utility you do or dont derive, the category agrees with ontological justified categories of observation

To me it seems silly we should enforce any racial policy solely based on the fact that apparently their are some real genetic differences between certain races/sub-populations.

sure, i wont contest what you think ought to be done or not on tis

And I won't contest the science of apparent genetic differences between certain races/sub-populations, for I am no genetic scientist.