Message from @Adolf Stalin

Discord ID: 607643972118249472


2019-08-04 07:47:13 UTC  

Should teens from 15 and up be allowed to watch porn legally but with restrictions

2019-08-04 07:47:19 UTC  

I wonder what most ppl think

2019-08-04 07:47:25 UTC  

About this question

2019-08-04 07:47:37 UTC  

Idk if it’s nsfw

2019-08-04 07:48:03 UTC  

No.

2019-08-04 07:49:49 UTC  

What leads one to that inquiry Β¬ is the real question.

2019-08-04 07:52:13 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526921073397071892/607480902045401088/IMG_20190608_193432_887.jpg

2019-08-04 08:25:04 UTC  

@Britney Spears 2.0πŸ’– no you sick bastard

2019-08-04 09:06:49 UTC  

@Britney Spears 2.0πŸ’–
Stop promoting the consumption of porn, sex is solely for procreation.

2019-08-04 09:07:10 UTC  

If you're so base you cant find satisfaction elsewhere you don't deserve the title of human

2019-08-04 13:20:41 UTC  

^^^^ when you just commit the naturalistic fallacy like it ain't a big deal

2019-08-04 16:59:29 UTC  

was there a raid?

2019-08-04 18:38:45 UTC  

haven't been in here awhile

2019-08-04 18:38:49 UTC  

whats been new?

2019-08-04 18:38:49 UTC  

yo

2019-08-04 18:39:06 UTC  

not much, in Politics arguing about gun shit

2019-08-04 18:39:27 UTC  

btw got a debate question @everyone can Foucault's theories be applied to Authoritarianism?

2019-08-04 18:39:35 UTC  

lol

2019-08-04 18:40:12 UTC  

I've written an essay describing why they can, lemme find it

2019-08-04 18:44:40 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526921073397071892/607645097282240542/foucauldian_christianity.docx

2019-08-04 19:35:28 UTC  

hello there. new here, read rules and roles. how to start doing staff? what topics are the most discussed and/or "main"?

2019-08-04 20:17:14 UTC  

we just go from point to point

2019-08-04 20:18:22 UTC  

@Farao Ramses II race realism like 19th century anthropology is actually becoming more popular within the scientific consensus due to genetic research being done and PCA analysis on fst distance

2019-08-04 20:18:49 UTC  

Intriguing.

2019-08-04 20:18:59 UTC  

19th century anthropology is being vindicated

2019-08-04 20:18:59 UTC  

I believed we discussed that before though.

2019-08-04 20:19:03 UTC  

maybe

2019-08-04 20:19:17 UTC  

We talked about sub-populations and what not.

2019-08-04 20:21:01 UTC  

I don't recall the exact details or meat of the conversation, but I do recall that it didn't change my stance in regard to my politics, considering an appeal to the science was very much an appeal to nature.

2019-08-04 20:21:41 UTC  

In other words: to me it seems like one giant naturalistic fallacy.

2019-08-04 20:22:30 UTC  

no, not really, categories are only justified through the utility but the common argument against race realism is that it doesnt comport with nature

2019-08-04 20:22:36 UTC  

now its obvious it does

2019-08-04 20:22:53 UTC  

now what you ought to do with that information is different

2019-08-04 20:23:04 UTC  

I conceded that point to an extend if I recall correctly. But again: unclear on the details.

2019-08-04 20:23:30 UTC  

but whatever utility you do or dont derive, the category agrees with ontological justified categories of observation

2019-08-04 20:24:06 UTC  

To me it seems silly we should enforce any racial policy solely based on the fact that apparently their are some real genetic differences between certain races/sub-populations.

2019-08-04 20:24:51 UTC  

sure, i wont contest what you think ought to be done or not on tis

2019-08-04 20:25:57 UTC  

And I won't contest the science of apparent genetic differences between certain races/sub-populations, for I am no genetic scientist.