not that it doesnt affect oughts

It being problematic is not in itself a scientific point.

because its does

scientist take for granted the sector theyre referring to dilapidating is problematic

anthropologist work with the axioms of what defines society or civilization

You do realize the idea of a problem existing is within the realm of human emotion, not within the realm of the natural world per se?

scientist most certainly use the term problematic in reference to normative standards that they make obvious

It is indeed normative.

i think youre not understanding

yes

Science is not normative though.

It is descriptive.

and scientist appeal to normative standard in how they define the research and its conclusions

Sure they do.

I am not contesting that.

like nearly every abstract does that

so youre not contesting anything i said

I do not precisely recall what I was contesting, but it had to do with the definition of 'policy'.

scientist conclude that climate change is problematic relative to the normative of having a productive, healthy or capable society

i dont think so

We were originally speaking about policy and consequence.

In relation to scientific fact.

and how its informed by science

Ah, that is what I sort of contested.

I made the claim that policy is based on desired outcome.

I would like to amend that however.

how policy is adopted in reference to perceived reality and how science informs perceived reality

That I do agree with.

k

If I disagreed with that earlier, I don't recall why.

I am sorry, bit fuzzy in the brain.

lol np

Ah, I see where we went wrong. I made the remark that policy is based on desire, while I should have said policy is a course of action meant to reach a desired outcome.

Which sparked most of the discussion following.

k

hello, does anyone want to talk about protests and democracy? My point: protests do not lead to "more" democracy.

Protests are in their nature democratic though.

I would say democracy is bad because the 51% can take away the rights of the 49%

That could happen regardless from there being a democratic system in place.

Besides, a minority is more likely to trample over the rights of the (majority of) citizens than any democratic system with regular elections is.

world peace finally happenin! people are figuring out WW2, like the true story. please share! https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/anti-gravity-b52-bombers-won-ww2-ari-asulin/?published=t
i think the thing that did it, when everyone realized trump was going to win in 2020 because the media had been lying about him for over 4 years straight, they realized the same principle might be true for the last 100 years of global warfare. i.e. the victors of WW2 created public schools to teach a false version of their victory. Kinda obvious really