Message from @Adoring Fan
Discord ID: 451206489147703297
If so, you are a hypocrite.
@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 it was a redistribution of food
So answer carefully.
which entailed removal
No it was a redistribution of food production
He literally is brainwashed
must explain why wheat was taken
Don't worry puppet we will sever your strings
as was grain
also explains why people starved, can't produce food, cant eat
definitely not deliberate or anything
just an indirect, totally unintended effect
Does redistribution involve taking ALL of it? Or SOME of it?
The accusation grain was taken assumes again genocidal temdecies. Why would Stalin genocide Ukranians?
we didn't anticipate that removing the food and food production devices of all these peasants would cause them to starve
how could they possibly have known
hmm
why would he
not like there were
revolts
***ANYTHING LIKE THAT AT ALL***
Stalin subsequently addressed by literally giving in the 1936 referendum the right to leave the USSR to any republics. So of course why would Stalin try this method if he could just genocide them.
make america gay again
@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 hmm yeah i wonder if there was any sort of backlash because of it... hmmm
Phakts
@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 Didn't you know? Big Bad Emperor Stalin singlehandedly slaughtered his work-force. This is just common sense here. Duh.
yeah no i cant really think of any backlash because of millions of people dying
look
stalin was a saint
Because greedy land owners sabotaged the food production?
stalin is as saintly as Trayvon Martin
Why would they do that?
yeah they sabotaged their own production
Isn't that illogical?
Because then their food is fucked
and were allowed to leave to get food elsewhere
And they're the land owners.
definitely
._.
Because collectivization meant give up their bourgeoise control