must explain why wheat was taken

Don't worry puppet we will sever your strings

as was grain

also explains why people starved, can't produce food, cant eat

definitely not deliberate or anything

just an indirect, totally unintended effect

Does redistribution involve taking ALL of it? Or SOME of it?

The accusation grain was taken assumes again genocidal temdecies. Why would Stalin genocide Ukranians?

we didn't anticipate that removing the food and food production devices of all these peasants would cause them to starve

how could they possibly have known

hmm

why would he

not like there were

revolts

or

***ANYTHING LIKE THAT AT ALL***

Stalin subsequently addressed by literally giving in the 1936 referendum the right to leave the USSR to any republics. So of course why would Stalin try this method if he could just genocide them.

make america gay again

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 hmm yeah i wonder if there was any sort of backlash because of it... hmmm

Phakts

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 Didn't you know? Big Bad Emperor Stalin singlehandedly slaughtered his work-force. This is just common sense here. Duh.

yeah no i cant really think of any backlash because of millions of people dying

look

stalin was a saint

Because greedy land owners sabotaged the food production?

stalin is as saintly as Trayvon Martin

Why would they do that?

yeah they sabotaged their own production

Isn't that illogical?

Because then their food is fucked

and were allowed to leave to get food elsewhere

And they're the land owners.

definitely

._.

Because collectivization meant give up their bourgeoise control

Trayvon Martin is a god damn saint

So why kill themselves in a famine?

._.

yeah the only logical conclusion isnt that the production devices were confiscated or destroyed, but that they broke them themselves

If they're the land owners then it obviously effects them.

Because they wanted to pressure the soviet government into reversing collectivization it was a risk that did not pay off.