Message from @tsarsNeezy
Discord ID: 451485008931192833
This wasn't a debate, it was you blaming da jooz.
everyone can see your debates, as you so like to analogize, are akin to your excrament
You failed to answer my questions regarding how wealthy and well-informed sympathizers of the Russian Revolution have anything to do with (((them))).
I don't see a problem with that. Why do You?
Holy shit
next you will try vapidly to assert that I'm a homosexual, because your 80 IQ brain hasn't exactly benefited enough from the environment to allow you to go past autistic insults like ur gay lmao.
How did they contribute anything to (((them))) while contributing to the revolution?
watching two ideologies I hate argue is wonderful
(((they))) themselves were the ones who wished for communism to happen
It's like Nazi Germany vs the USSR and I am just America, watching yall kill each other off and come in and take the victory 4th quarter
@Adoring Fan I obviously touched a nerve with that one. Good thing I didn't touch your private place, otherwise you might have had some flashbacks to when Uncledaddy took you camping.
the jewish oil moguls and bankers did not wish to have their own assets seized, which they never did. They wished for their "historical oppressors" to be oppressed
lmao, exactly what I mean
you are incapable of arguing, if your life dependent on it
ad hominem battles inbound!
it's not even an ad hom
it's just an insult
ad hominem debates are fucking great as long as both parties are participating
i have no reason to participate in nonsensical "ur gay" "no u" battles
nothing comes out of it.
>:)
attempting to be witty for the sake of approval from your friends at worldstar can only get you so far
ur gay
wit does not uncover truth
@Adoring Fan You've literally failed to provide any substantial evidence that doesn't amount to anecdotal bullshit from a 1920s NY Times article that you obviously didn't read, or some quote which supposedly originated from a member of the CPUSA at a rally that may not have even taken place. You have no reliable sources whatsoever.
anecdotal how?
I've given you a list of elites that funded the revolution and its end result
!rank
NIG NOG WHAT
!levels
Go check **Politicord Simulator**'s leaderboard here https://mee6.xyz/leaderboard/450389123081961472. <:WINK6:403540173566115840>
Philadelphia communists, 1936-1956, Paul Lyons, page 81 @Deleted User
First of all, Parvus wasn't an "elite" by any means. He was NOT a capitalist. Secondly, Olof may have been an "elite," but he was clearly a well-known communist sympathizer, and obviously wanted nothing to do with the private interests of the financial oligarchy. They were both class-traitors, which is a good thing.
He was a government official, with a position of power.
most communists including your butt buddy the anglo whatshisname will say that that's enough to be considered capitalistic
;;
!rank
GKJLDSBFJKASBDJKASN