i typed out another paragraph but i realised i was going into a level of nuance that was unnecessary

you should read industrial society and its future, E

Kaczynski was a prophet

i encourage every fascist to

@FLanon its true

I'm not a fash

what are you?

"the man who had killed three people and injured 23 more during a 17-year mail-bomb spree that authorities could not solve."

A centrist. I agree with some points of the left and right. But not communism or fascism or anarchy or anything like that. I guess Im an individualist if anything.

why are you in the fash party

also, kaczyski was mad individualist, cant be any more individualist than when you are fully autonomous

read the manifesto 🗡

Because its a political simulator and because it's better to know fascists more.

No.

Anyway, what's the technoindustrial system?

Cmon, time is ticking.

the current system by which nearly the whole world operates: one reliant on industrialisation and technology

i was just a bit taken aback because its a strange question to ask

its in the name

Oh so that's what you mean.

I know but it depends on what you think the system is

So anprim essentially?

almost - anprim has implications that i don't really subscribe to, i don't think reverting to the stone age is practical. we can live relatively modern lives without relying on a massive industrial system for sustinence

plus it's impossible to remove basic technology

So what technology are you against? Also you type pretty slow.

any technology which revokes a person's autonomy

if you have a car, and you can't live the life you do without it

you're reliant on it

that reliance at a global scale is the technoindustrial system

Not really. Most people I know arent reliant on cars.

was just an example lol

Then how about a better example?

would the people you know starve to death or experience a dramatic change to their lives if a massive EMP detonated above them?

if the answer is yes, they are reliant on the technology they use in their daily lives

finding sustinence in an urban environment without the fluid continuation of the system is extremely difficult

even in rural environments without proper survivalism skills

Technology has a weakness correct but that's the thing people are trying to advance more in technology.

Humans build their own environment.

ah yes technology is weak so we are trying to negate that weakness with more technology

Some technology is weak.

Depends on the weakness.