the president said he'd veto any bill without wall funding

That is one thing both sides didn't mess with the legislative filibuster.

you're talking about the spending bill right

he needs at least 24 billion for a full wall

@AnonFrom/b/ issue is *how much* funding

he won't get it

he's put 5 billion out there

20 billion is what he asked for last time

wait what?

5 billion won't do it

must have 25bn

trump said he wouldn't sign a bill like the last one again

NO LOL

yes, but an issue is that we need to have the full 25 billion

WHAT IS it with you guys and meme candidates

Joe Arpaio

who?

Like c'mon why

If only Arpaio worked around here

Joe Arpaio is Roy Moore 2.0

my neighborhood would probably end up deserted

@FLanon Of course they would.

@FLanon You don't think a black Democrat could run on "WE HAve to TEAR DOWN WALLS!"

I could totally see that happening.

It's not really infrastructure when it's seen as a republican creation...

I can totally see it.

Be defintiion, but not anything they benefit from they'll see

The Interstate Act lol

people loved that though

And everyone benefitted from it.

I am.

I love Gitmo

@Deleted User The Interstate Highway Act is a terrible comparison because 1: everyone benefits from them
2: they were created for a military purpose during the cold war
3: America was white then

my town probably white then too...

Democrats can totally run on tearing down Trump's wall because it will be seen as a symbol of racism.

I agree

For them

if you're referring to the 1950s that is

You seriously underestimate the Democratic Party

@Deleted User This

Thank you.