I was making fun of someone who said that

>But this other statistic using a different formula shows that it's lower!

So nuje

you have failed to proved evidence to disprove my theory.

I am right, and we can't win.

then quit

Correct.

yay

I mean that's your choice

It's not my choice.

it's right.

It is your choice

Do you have evidence proving it wrong>?

Leave or stay.

That the Progressives have never been stopped.

If you don't care to change anything, you have no reason to stay

You even need to use loaded statistics that don't factor the value of currency into their calculations.

Oh I'm not going to give up, I just want to make sure we're on the same page here.

Well obviously society is going to change

That's just a given

That we're in a losing battle.

If you believe it's impossible and simply don't bother, then don't even bother being here.

There are forces more powerful than we can imagine fighting us.

because I'd be a hypocrit.

If I gave up.

If you don't want to face them, go.

Zak's stat reminded me of that time that the Eurasian Economic Union had a lower combined GDP than Russia but Russia was a member

and the CIA was the source

http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf

There ya go Nuke.

Wrong again

;)

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=43&pr.y=19&sy=2017&ey=2017&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C672%2C914%2C946%2C612%2C137%2C614%2C546%2C311%2C962%2C213%2C674%2C911%2C676%2C193%2C548%2C122%2C556%2C912%2C678%2C313%2C181%2C419%2C867%2C513%2C682%2C316%2C684%2C913%2C273%2C124%2C868%2C339%2C921%2C638%2C948%2C514%2C943%2C218%2C686%2C963%2C688%2C616%2C518%2C223%2C728%2C516%2C558%2C918%2C138%2C748%2C196%2C618%2C278%2C624%2C692%2C522%2C694%2C622%2C142%2C156%2C449%2C626%2C564%2C628%2C565%2C228%2C283%2C924%2C853%2C233%2C288%2C632%2C293%2C636%2C566%2C634%2C964%2C238%2C182%2C662%2C359%2C960%2C453%2C423%2C968%2C935%2C922%2C128%2C714%2C611%2C862%2C321%2C135%2C243%2C716%2C248%2C456%2C469%2C722%2C253%2C942%2C642%2C718%2C643%2C724%2C939%2C576%2C644%2C936%2C819%2C961%2C172%2C813%2C132%2C199%2C646%2C733%2C648%2C184%2C915%2C524%2C134%2C361%2C652%2C362%2C174%2C364%2C328%2C732%2C258%2C366%2C656%2C734%2C654%2C144%2C336%2C146%2C263%2C463%2C268%2C528%2C532%2C923%2C944%2C738%2C176%2C578%2C534%2C537%2C536%2C742%2C429%2C866%2C433%2C369%2C178%2C744%2C436%2C186%2C136%2C925%2C343%2C869%2C158%2C746%2C439%2C926%2C916%2C466%2C664%2C112%2C826%2C111%2C542%2C298%2C967%2C927%2C443%2C846%2C917%2C299%2C544%2C582%2C941%2C474%2C446%2C754%2C666%2C698%2C668&s=PPPGDP&grp=0&a=

http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP_PPP.pdf

PPP is idiotic

And for you to really get a biased source

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html

use offical exchange rates

>official exchange rates

PPP has more relevence to the people of that country

Yeah but IRL.