Message from @zakattack04

Discord ID: 459177012872085514


2018-06-21 01:39:41 UTC  

@Deleted User You're suppose to put good reps in tougher districts, so they have a better chance at winning it.

2018-06-21 01:39:51 UTC  

The weak debators and lack of public speakers, you put in safe districts.

2018-06-21 01:40:27 UTC  

Actually, I'd put the good, hardline debaters who would get in trouble with risky statements in safe districts.

2018-06-21 01:40:46 UTC  

If Darrel Issa wasn't the republican of CA-39, it would've been blue.

2018-06-21 01:40:58 UTC  

And he had plenty of controversial statements.

2018-06-21 01:41:09 UTC  

That's good I guess.

2018-06-21 01:41:28 UTC  

I'd personally like to redistrict LA-2 so that it's a purple district, and then run in it.

2018-06-21 01:42:17 UTC  

@Nuke makes sense. I understand zak's argument, but yours makes sense because you want the articulate hardliners to take charge and at the same time, not be threatened by opponents

2018-06-21 01:43:27 UTC  

@Deleted User Would you rather have Scott Walker in Wisconsin or Oklahoma.

2018-06-21 01:43:30 UTC  

That's the way I look at it.

2018-06-21 01:43:35 UTC  

No one else could've won that state.

2018-06-21 01:43:43 UTC  

And he's a better republican then most safe R governors.

2018-06-21 01:52:01 UTC  

as Governor, yeah

but as Senator? It doesn't just matter if they can win election, it matters what they push for while they're in office

2018-06-21 01:52:12 UTC  

Rubio

2018-06-21 01:52:31 UTC  

Toomey

2018-06-21 01:52:49 UTC  

Both pretty damn good republicans, running in contested states.

2018-06-21 01:53:11 UTC  

as Senators

2018-06-21 01:55:11 UTC  

The biggest testament to this is Toomey.

2018-06-21 02:01:22 UTC  

Yeah.

2018-06-21 02:01:46 UTC  

This argument isn't really relevant though because none of us are running for office or have the petition ability to do so.

2018-06-21 02:05:30 UTC  

"Flanon, you probably would want to represent any of these areas" - RS

2018-06-21 02:05:46 UTC  

That's where this discussion originated from.

2018-06-21 02:06:11 UTC  

@zakattack04 I have a bible verse that confirms that you are a sinner for your ways

2018-06-21 02:06:24 UTC  

Fire away.

2018-06-21 02:06:30 UTC  

Leviticus 18:23

2018-06-21 02:06:31 UTC  

**Leviticus 18:23 - King James Version (KJV)**

```Dust


<23> Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion. ```

2018-06-21 02:06:33 UTC  

Repent

2018-06-21 02:06:38 UTC  

There it is

2018-06-21 02:06:39 UTC  

>beast

2018-06-21 02:06:41 UTC  

I still win.

2018-06-21 02:06:54 UTC  

No sex with animals zak!

2018-06-21 02:06:58 UTC  

Don't do it!

2018-06-21 02:07:00 UTC  

Dragons aren't beasts.

2018-06-21 02:07:04 UTC  

Dragons are intelligent.

2018-06-21 02:07:14 UTC  

Furry - 1
FLcuck - 0

2018-06-21 02:07:27 UTC  

Stop sodomizing your dog zak!

2018-06-21 02:07:34 UTC  

Gross.

2018-06-21 02:07:37 UTC  

It is a sin!

2018-06-21 02:07:40 UTC  

I would never do that, anal is disgusting.

2018-06-21 02:07:55 UTC  

And i love my dog than you very much. I would never abuse him like that.

2018-06-21 02:07:57 UTC  

So you would have oral sex with your dog then?