Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 459170275410575360
I won't undunce you then.
We'll keep you for twice as long in that case
To make up for that time we didn't catch you
I posted this like 2 months ago.
lmao
Tightening our belts bro
Whatever man.
Wasn't even blackpilling.
Yeah you were shitposting
That wasn't shitposting either.
I was mocking red storm.
Which isn't against the rules..
>over 4000 incel girls lost their womanhood last year
SAD
Can you guys at least let button in here.
so I have someone to talk to,.
FtM also cannot be impregnated if they undergo HRT.
Even if they change back
@Nuke can you unban button?
Why?
@Deleted User You're suppose to put good reps in tougher districts, so they have a better chance at winning it.
The weak debators and lack of public speakers, you put in safe districts.
Actually, I'd put the good, hardline debaters who would get in trouble with risky statements in safe districts.
If Darrel Issa wasn't the republican of CA-39, it would've been blue.
And he had plenty of controversial statements.
That's good I guess.
I'd personally like to redistrict LA-2 so that it's a purple district, and then run in it.
@Nuke makes sense. I understand zak's argument, but yours makes sense because you want the articulate hardliners to take charge and at the same time, not be threatened by opponents
@Deleted User Would you rather have Scott Walker in Wisconsin or Oklahoma.
That's the way I look at it.
No one else could've won that state.
And he's a better republican then most safe R governors.
as Governor, yeah
but as Senator? It doesn't just matter if they can win election, it matters what they push for while they're in office
Rubio
Toomey
Both pretty damn good republicans, running in contested states.
as Senators
The biggest testament to this is Toomey.
Yeah.