yep

I do not see a net loss in the senate race.

But this map WILL change if different senators vote for Kavanaugh or don't vote for Kavanaugh.

If DOnnelly votes Kavanaugh, it'll shrink.

If Manchin doesn't vote Kavanaugh I'd reconsider it being blue but not enough to consider it red.

Everything I’ve seen has just been like 2016

@Rhodesiaboo then you must not have payed any attention at all in 2016

Literally where we are right now is where we were in 2016

It was when the grab her by the pussy tape came out and we all thought we were going to lose badly

The congressional polls were nothing like they are now

Most of them

I remember 2016

This is nothing like 2016

^

Welp, keep denying it

Wasn't Hildawg up by double digits around the grab her by the pussy time?

Yeah

And a lot of these races says the democrats are up by double digits.

Kill the polling companies by proving their biased pollings wrong

The more money they lose

The more they'll be less inclined to be biased

That’s a great idea

https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1044361088794603527

I'd definitely give the edge to McSally at this point

yep

Definitely contributes to the 'Hollywood Sinema' narrative, plays into our hand very well

http://www.270towin.com/2018-senate-election/l7b1L8

Current prediction

Here’s what I think would be the best possible outcome

@Rhodesiaboo honestly Klobuchar (Minnesota) is easier than Heinrich ( New Mexico)

Maybe

Also (((Klobuchar)))

Lol, that’s impossible.

The only dem incumbents who are in any danger are Heitkamp, McCaskill, Nelson, Tester, and Donnelly.

And we’ll probably only flip 2 of those, 3 if we’re lucky.

I'd say that's too pessimistic of an outlook

I agree with RS.

But I also assume that your toss-up there actually refers to Johnson winning

That said

Other than Emerson, most non-Libertarian polls actually show Rich in second.